@CollectionFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE, KNOWN_ORDER})
  public void testRemovingIteratorKnownOrder() {
    new IteratorTester<E>(
        4,
        MODIFIABLE,
        getSubjectGenerator().order(Arrays.asList(e0(), e1(), e1(), e2())),
        IteratorTester.KnownOrder.KNOWN_ORDER) {
      @Override
      protected Iterator<E> newTargetIterator() {

      for (Integer j : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
        assertFalse(range.contains(j));
      }
    }
  }

  public void testCreateEmptyRangeOpenClosedSucceeds() {
    for (Integer i : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
      GeneralRange<@Nullable Integer> range = GeneralRange.range(ORDERING, i, OPEN, i, CLOSED);
      for (Integer j : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
        assertFalse(range.contains(j));
      }
    }
  }

  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = KNOWN_ORDER, value = SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE)
  public void testIterator_unknownOrderRemoveSupported() {
    runIteratorTest(MODIFIABLE, IteratorTester.KnownOrder.UNKNOWN_ORDER, getSampleElements());
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = {KNOWN_ORDER, SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE})

   * they were inserted into the builder. For example, in the above example, {@code
   * WORD_TO_INT.entrySet()} is guaranteed to iterate over the entries in the order {@code "one"=1,
   * "two"=2, "three"=3}, and {@code keySet()} and {@code values()} respect the same order. If you
   * want a different order, consider using {@link #orderEntriesByValue(Comparator)}, which changes

      }

      @Override
      public List<String> order(List<String> insertionOrder) {
        List<String> order = Lists.newArrayList();
        for (String s : insertionOrder) {
          int index = order.indexOf(s);
          if (index == -1) {
            order.add(s);
          } else {
            order.add(index, s);
          }
        }
        return order;
      }
    };
  }

  public void testCreate() {

   * dispatching an event, guaranteeing that all events posted on a single thread are dispatched to
   * all subscribers in the order they are posted.
   *
   * <p>When all subscribers are dispatched to using a <i>direct</i> executor (which dispatches on
   * the same thread that posts the event), this yields a breadth-first dispatch order on each
   * thread. That is, all subscribers to a single event A will be called before any subscribers to

    @Override
    public Iterable<Entry<E>> order(List<Entry<E>> insertionOrder) {
      // We mimic the order from gen.
      Map<E, Entry<E>> map = new LinkedHashMap<>();
      for (Entry<E> entry : insertionOrder) {
        map.put(entry.getElement(), entry);
      }

      Set<E> seen = new HashSet<>();
      List<Entry<E>> order = new ArrayList<>();
      for (E e : gen.order(new ArrayList<E>(map.keySet()))) {

    testers.add(ListToArrayTester.class);
    return testers;
  }

  /**
   * Specifies {@link CollectionFeature#KNOWN_ORDER} for all list tests, since lists have an
   * iteration ordering corresponding to the insertion order.
   */
  @Override
  public TestSuite createTestSuite() {
    withFeatures(KNOWN_ORDER);
    return super.createTestSuite();
  }

  @Override
  protected List<TestSuite> createDerivedSuites(

    }

    protected SortBuilder<?> createFieldSortBuilder(final String field, final SortOrder order) {
        if (QueryFieldConfig.SCORE_FIELD.equals(field) || QueryFieldConfig.DOC_SCORE_FIELD.equals(field)) {
            return SortBuilders.scoreSort().order(order);
        }
        return SortBuilders.fieldSort(field).order(order);
    }

    protected boolean isSearchField(final String field) {

     *
     * @since 3.5.0
     */
    List<MavenProject> getAllProjects();

    /**
     * Gets all projects in their intended build order, i.e. after topologically sorting the projects according to their
     * interdependencies.
     *
     * @return The projects in the build order, never {@code null}.
     */
    List<MavenProject> getSortedProjects();

    /**