method signatures would look like, for example, even if the method and class names are still
        in flux. This can make the feature you're suggesting much clearer to us.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: (Optional) What would the method signatures for your feature look like?
      placeholder: |
        e.g.,
        public static <E> ImmutableList<E> of();

  /** User's current working directory. */
  USER_DIR("user.dir");

  private final String key;

  StandardSystemProperty(String key) {
    this.key = key;
  }

  /** Returns the key used to look up this system property. */
  public String key() {
    return key;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the current value for this system property by delegating to {@link
   * System#getProperty(String)}.
   *

   * @param len the number of bytes to read from the buffer
   */
  public static boolean isWellFormed(byte[] bytes, int off, int len) {
    int end = off + len;
    checkPositionIndexes(off, end, bytes.length);
    // Look for the first non-ASCII character.
    for (int i = off; i < end; i++) {
      if (bytes[i] < 0) {
        return isWellFormedSlowPath(bytes, i, end);
      }
    }
    return true;
  }

 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *
 * (We could consider releasing a listenablefuture:1.0.1 someday. But we would want to look into how
 * that affects users, especially users of the Android Gradle Plugin, since the plugin developers
 * put in a special hack for us: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/131431257)
 */

    if (state != State.NOT_DONE && (numListeners != 0 || numThreads != 0)) {
      throw new SkipThisScenarioException();
    }
  }

  // This exclusion doesn't exclude the TOMBSTONE objects we set. So 'done' NEW futures will look
  // larger than they are.
  @SuppressWarnings("FutureReturnValueIgnored")
  @Footprint(exclude = {Runnable.class, Executor.class, Thread.class, Exception.class})
  public Object measureSize() {

   * its input unmodified. Provided that the test suite is built without {@link
   * com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionFeature#KNOWN_ORDER}, the tests will look
   * only at the returned contents without regard for order.
   */
  Iterable<E> order(List<E> insertionOrder);

    if (state != State.NOT_DONE && (numListeners != 0 || numThreads != 0)) {
      throw new SkipThisScenarioException();
    }
  }

  // This exclusion doesn't exclude the TOMBSTONE objects we set. So 'done' NEW futures will look
  // larger than they are.
  @SuppressWarnings("FutureReturnValueIgnored")
  @Footprint(exclude = {Runnable.class, Executor.class, Thread.class, Exception.class})
  public Object measureSize() {

   * its input unmodified. Provided that the test suite is built without {@link
   * com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionFeature#KNOWN_ORDER}, the tests will look
   * only at the returned contents without regard for order.
   */
  Iterable<E> order(List<E> insertionOrder);

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.util.Map;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * A {@link CharEscaper} that uses an array to quickly look up replacement characters for a given
 * {@code char} value. An additional safe range is provided that determines whether {@code char}
 * values without specific replacements are to be considered safe and left unescaped or should be

    return result;
  }

  /*
   * If I understand correctly:
   *
   * This needs to be a @JsMethod so that J2CL knows to look for a JavaScript implemention of
   * it in Platform.native.js. (The JavaScript implementation inline below is visible to *GWT*, but
   * *J2CL* doesn't look at it.)
   *
   * However, once it's a @JsMethod, GWT produces a warning. That's because (a) the *other* purpose