specific language governing permissions and limitations
under the License.
-->

<project>
    <modelVersion>4.999.999</modelVersion>
    <!-- this should be a fake "future" version that only has modelVersion understood by us -->
    <coordinates>tests.project:future-model-version</coordinates>

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same

specific language governing permissions and limitations
under the License.
-->

<project>
  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
  <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
  <artifactId>project-plugin-level-configuration-only</artifactId>
  <version>1.0.1</version>
  <build>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>
        <groupId>org.codehaus.modello</groupId>
        <artifactId>modello-maven-plugin</artifactId>
        <version>1.0.1</version>

    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
      <artifactId>maven-toolchain-model</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <!-- Used for Javadoc in a deprecated class only -->
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
      <artifactId>maven-toolchain-builder</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>

  <version>1.0</version>
  <name>Guava ListenableFuture only</name>
  <description>
    Contains Guava's com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class,
    without any of its other classes -- but is also available in a second
    "version" that omits the class to avoid conflicts with the copy in Guava
    itself. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same