unwrappedPsi.operationToken in OperatorConventions.EQUALS_OPERATIONS)
            ) {
                // TODO: Handle compound assignment
                handleAsFunctionCall(this, unwrappedPsi)?.toKtCallCandidateInfos()?.let { return@with it }
            }

        require(packageSymbol is KtFe10PackageSymbol)
        val packageFragments = analysisContext.resolveSession.packageFragmentProvider.packageFragments(packageSymbol.fqName)
        val scopeDescription = "Compound scope for package \"${packageSymbol.fqName}\""
        val chainedScope = ChainedMemberScope.create(scopeDescription, packageFragments.map { it.getMemberScope() })

            assignmentRValue.source?.kind is KtFakeSourceElementKind.DesugaredAugmentedAssign
        ) {
            require(assignmentRValue is FirResolvable) {
                "Rvalue of desugared compound assignment should be resolvable, but it was ${assignmentRValue::class}"
            }

            return assignmentRValue.calleeReference.toTargetSymbol(session, symbolBuilder)
        }

        if (deparenthesize(callExpression.calleeExpression) != calleeExpression) return null
        return callExpression
    }

    /**
     * For `=` and compound access like `+=`, `-=`, `*=`, `/=`, `%=`, the LHS of the binary expression is not a complete call. Hence we
     * find the containing binary expression and resolve that instead.
     *

- [`KT-61441`](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-61441) K2: Wrong overload is chosen with ImplicitIntegerCoercion enabled
- [`KT-59328`](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-59328) K2: property with compound getter and without explicit type: compilation failure, IAE "List has more than one element" at FirDeclarationsResolveTransformer.transformFunctionWithGivenSignature()