* This API does not try to cover all the requirements out there, just the basic ones, and is intentionally simple.
 * If plugin or extension needs anything more complex feature wise (i.e. HTTP range support or alike) it should
 * probably roll its own.
 * <p>
 * This implementation is backed by Maven Resolver API, supported protocols and transport selection depends on it. If

    String SELF_COMBINATION_MERGE = "merge";

    String SELF_COMBINATION_REMOVE = "remove";

    /**
     * In case of complex XML structures, combining can be done based on id.
     */
    String ID_COMBINATION_MODE_ATTRIBUTE = "combine.id";

    /**
     * In case of complex XML structures, combining can be done based on keys.
     * This is a comma separated list of attribute names.
     */

 * task cannot be implemented with {@link ListeningExecutorService}, the various {@link Futures}
 * utility methods, or {@link ListenableFutureTask}. Those APIs have less opportunity for developer
 * error. If your needs are more complex than {@code SettableFuture} supports, use {@link
 * AbstractFuture}, which offers an extensible version of the API.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @since 9.0 (in 1.0 as {@code ValueFuture})
 */
@GwtCompatible

 *   <li>network/transfer errors</li>
 *   <li>file system errors: permissions</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * TODO carlos: all these possible has*Exceptions and get*Exceptions methods make the clients too
 *       complex requiring a long list of checks, need to create a parent/interface/encapsulation
 *       for the types of exceptions
 */
@Deprecated
public class ArtifactResolutionResult {

  }

  @Override
  public final void clear() {
    backingMap.clear();
    size = 0;
  }

  /**
   * Skeleton of per-entry iterators. We could push this down and win a few bytes, but it's complex
   * enough it's not especially worth it.
   */
  abstract class Itr<T extends @Nullable Object> implements Iterator<T> {
    int entryIndex = backingMap.firstIndex();
    int toRemove = -1;

 *       MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator}.
 *   <li>If you manually call {@link java.util.concurrent.FutureTask#set} or a similar method,
 *       create a {@link SettableFuture} instead. (If your needs are more complex, you may prefer
 *       {@link AbstractFuture}.)
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Test doubles</b>: If you need a {@code ListenableFuture} for your test, try a {@link

 *       MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator}.
 *   <li>If you manually call {@link java.util.concurrent.FutureTask#set} or a similar method,
 *       create a {@link SettableFuture} instead. (If your needs are more complex, you may prefer
 *       {@link AbstractFuture}.)
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Test doubles</b>: If you need a {@code ListenableFuture} for your test, try a {@link

   *       com.google.common.base.Joiner#skipNulls}.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that constructors taking a builder object cannot be tested effectively because
   * semantics of builder can be arbitrarily complex. Still, a factory class can be created in the
   * test to facilitate equality testing. For example:
   *
   * <pre>
   * public class FooTest {
   *
   *   private static class FooFactoryForTest {

 *       operation that causes a key to have zero associated values has the effect of
 *       <i>removing</i> that key from the multimap.
 *   <li>The total entry count is available as {@link #size}.
 *   <li>Many complex operations become easier; for example, {@code
 *       Collections.min(multimap.values())} finds the smallest value across all keys.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h3>Implementations</h3>
 *
 * <ul>

    assertFalse(set.equals(Sets.newHashSet(4, 5, 6)));
    assertFalse(Sets.newHashSet(4, 5, 6).equals(set));

    Set<String> complex = Sets.newTreeSet(STRING_LENGTH);
    Collections.addAll(complex, "in", "the", "a");
    assertEquals(set, complex);
  }

  public void testEquals_bothDefaultOrdering_StringVsInt() {
    SortedSet<String> set = of("a", "b", "c");