* `new Integer` (as we do) instead of `Integer.valueOf`. However, under J2KT, `new Integer`
   * gets translated back to `Integer.valueOf` because that is the only thing J2KT can support. And
   * anyway, it's nice to avoid `Integer.valueOf` because the Android toolchain optimizes multiple
   * `Integer.valueOf` calls into one! So we stick with the deprecated `Integer` constructor.
   */

    if ((!features.contains(IteratorFeature.SUPPORTS_REMOVE) && removes > 1)
        || (stimuli.length >= 5 && removes > 2)) {
      // removes are the most expensive thing to test, since they often throw exceptions with stack
      // traces, so we test them a bit less aggressively
      return;
    }

  //
  // 1. What about leaving/unlocking? Are you going to do
  //    guard.enter() paired with monitor.leave()? That might get
  //    confusing. It's nice for the finally block to look as close as
  //    possible to the thing right before the try. You could have
  //    guard.leave(), but that's a little odd as well because the
  //    guard doesn't have anything to do with leaving. You can't

     * this is no worse than what FutureTask does in that situation. Additionally, because the
     * Future was cancelled, its listeners have been run, so its consumers will not hang.
     *
     * Contrast this to the situation we have if setResult() throws, a situation described below.
     */
    I sourceResult;
    try {
      sourceResult = getDone(localInputFuture);

    if ((!features.contains(IteratorFeature.SUPPORTS_REMOVE) && removes > 1)
        || (stimuli.length >= 5 && removes > 2)) {
      // removes are the most expensive thing to test, since they often throw exceptions with stack
      // traces, so we test them a bit less aggressively
      return;
    }

        }
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Call the non-timed {@link Future#get()} in a way that allows us to abort if it's expected to
   * hang forever. More precisely, if it's expected to return, we simply call it[*], but if it's
   * expected to hang (because one of the input futures that we know makes it up isn't done yet),
   * then we call it in a separate thread (using pseudoTimedGet). The result is that we wait as long

     * Wait for the interrupting thread to set DONE. (See interruptTask().) We want to wait so that
     * the interrupting thread doesn't interrupt the _next_ thing to run on this thread.
     *
     * Note: We don't reset the interrupted bit, just wait for it to be set. If this is a thread
     * pool thread, the thread pool will reset it for us. Otherwise, the interrupted bit may have

   * @param terminationTimeout how long to wait for the executor to finish before terminating the
   *     JVM
   * @param timeUnit unit of time for the time parameter
   * @return an unmodifiable version of the input which will not hang the JVM
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // TODO
  @SuppressWarnings("GoodTime") // should accept a java.time.Duration
  public static ExecutorService getExitingExecutorService(

        }
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Call the non-timed {@link Future#get()} in a way that allows us to abort if it's expected to
   * hang forever. More precisely, if it's expected to return, we simply call it[*], but if it's
   * expected to hang (because one of the input futures that we know makes it up isn't done yet),
   * then we call it in a separate thread (using pseudoTimedGet). The result is that we wait as long

     * to avoid the extra class for the lambda (and maybe more for memoizingSupplier itself) and the
     * indirection.
     *
     * One thing to *avoid* is a change to make each Logger user use memoizingSupplier directly:
     * That may introduce an extra class for each lambda (currently a dozen).
     */
    Logger local = logger;
    if (local != null) {