"name": "Mary",
    "joined": "2018-11-30",
}

my_second_user: User = User(**second_user_data)
```

!!! info
    `**second_user_data` quer dizer:

    Passe as chaves e valores do dicionário `second_user_data` diretamente como argumentos chave-valor, equivalente a: `User(id=4, name="Mary", joined="2018-11-30")`

### Suporte de editores

                String phase = event.getMojoExecution().getLifecyclePhase();
                if (phase != null) {
                    Deque<String> phases = getLifecycles(project);
                    if (!Objects.equals(phase, phases.peekLast())) {
                        phases.addLast(phase);
                        if ("clean".equals(phase)) {
                            cleanProjectLocalRepository(project);
                        }

             * MNG-2277, the check below compensates for our bad plugin support where we ended up with aggregator
             * plugins that require dependency resolution although they usually run in phases of the build where project
             * artifacts haven't been assembled yet. The prime example of this is "mvn release:prepare".
             */

## Version 4.2.1

_2019-10-02_

 *  Fix: In 4.1.0 we introduced a performance regression that prevented connections from being
    pooled in certain situations. We have good test coverage for connection pooling but we missed
    this because it only occurs if you have proxy configured and you share a connection pool among
    multiple `OkHttpClient` instances.

                    /*input_tensors_as_shapes*/ nullptr,
                    /*input_resource_shapes_and_types*/ nullptr, &output_shapes,
                    /*output_resource_shapes_and_types*/ nullptr, status_);
    CHECK_EQ(TF_OK, TF_GetCode(status_)) << TF_Message(status_);
    CHECK_EQ(output_shapes->num_items, 1);

    int num_dims = output_shapes->items[0].num_dims;
    int64_t* dims = output_shapes->items[0].dims;

     * <code>smb://server/</code>, or <code>smb://server/share/</code> URLs
     * because workgroups, servers, and shares cannot be dynamically created
     * (although in the future it may be possible to create shares).
     *
     * @throws CIFSException
     */
    void mkdirs () throws CIFSException;


    /**

            want to analyze the set of transitive dependencies, in particular during early lifecycle phases where
            full dependency resolution might fail due to projects which haven't been built yet.
          </description>
        </field>
        <field>
          <name>dependencyCollection</name>
          <version>2.0.0+</version>

    TFE_Op* op, TF_ShapeAndTypeList* input_shapes, TF_Tensor** input_tensors,
    TF_ShapeAndTypeList* input_tensor_as_shapes,
    TF_ShapeAndTypeList** input_resource_shapes_and_types,
    TF_ShapeAndTypeList** output_shapes,
    TF_ShapeAndTypeList*** output_resource_shapes_and_types, TF_Status* status);

TF_CAPI_EXPORT extern void
TF_ImportGraphDefOptionsSetValidateColocationConstraints(

void TFE_InferShapes(TFE_Op* tfe_op, TF_ShapeAndTypeList* input_shapes,
                     TF_Tensor** input_tensors,
                     TF_ShapeAndTypeList* input_tensors_as_shapes,
                     TF_ShapeAndTypeList** input_resource_shapes_and_types,
                     TF_ShapeAndTypeList** output_shapes,
                     TF_ShapeAndTypeList*** output_resource_shapes_and_types,
                     TF_Status* status) {

			return
		}
		sz := d.sizeRecursive(path.Key())
		leaves = append(leaves, struct {
			objects uint64
			path    dataUsageHash
		}{objects: sz.Objects, path: path})
		for ch := range e.Children {
			add(dataUsageHash(ch))
		}
	}

	// Add path recursively.
	add(path)
	sort.Slice(leaves, func(i, j int) bool {
		return leaves[i].objects < leaves[j].objects
	})
	for remove > 0 && len(leaves) > 0 {