switch(domain) {
            case "intel.com":
              console.log(await script.filter({github, context, domain}));
              break;
            case "apple.com":
              console.log(await script.filter({github, context, domain}));
              break;
            case "nvidia.com":
              console.log(await script.filter({github, context, domain}));

        that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the real-world use case so the
        community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually the *best* way to address
        the real use case, or whether or not a different abstraction might be more appropriate.


        It's okay if you can't provide complete context on a use case. We understand if you are not

    operator.istio.io/component: "Pilot"
    app: sidecar-injector
    release: {{ .Release.Name }}
webhooks:
{{- /* Set up the selectors. First section is for revision, rest is for "default" revision */}}

{{- /* Case 1: namespace selector matches, and object doesn't disable */}}
{{- /* Note: if both revision and legacy selector, we give precedence to the legacy one */}}

    matchExpressions:
    - key: sidecar.istio.io/inject
      operator: NotIn
      values:
      - "false"
    - key: istio.io/rev
      operator: In
      values:
      - "default"

{{- /* Case 1: Namespace selector enabled, and object selector is not injected */}}
{{- include "core" (mergeOverwrite (deepCopy $whv) (dict "Prefix" "namespace.") ) }}
  namespaceSelector:
    matchExpressions:
    - key: istio-injection

{{- /* When the tag is "default" we want to create webhooks for the default revision */}}
{{- /* These webhooks should be kept in sync with istio-discovery/templates/mutatingwebhook.yaml */}}
{{- if (eq $tagName "default") }}

{{- /* Case 1: Namespace selector enabled, and object selector is not injected */}}
{{- include "core" (mergeOverwrite (deepCopy $whv) (dict "Prefix" "namespace.") ) }}
  namespaceSelector:
    matchExpressions:
    - key: istio-injection

-       case 9:								      \
-	 __u->__ui = __c * 0x01010101;					      \
-	 __u = __extension__ ((void *) __u + 4);			      \
-       case 5:								      \
-	 __u->__ui = __c * 0x01010101;					      \
-	 __u = __extension__ ((void *) __u + 4);			      \
-       case 1:								      \
-	 __u->__uc = (unsigned char) __c;				      \
-	 break;								      \
-									      \
-       case 16:								      \

        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the
        real-world use case so the community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually
        the *best* way to address the real use case, or whether or not a different approach might be
        more appropriate.


        It's okay if you can't provide complete context on a use case. We understand if you are not

# Simulate the case where the default installation failed, and the user has to reinstall the components.
apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1
kind: MutatingWebhookConfiguration
metadata:
  labels:
    app: sidecar-injector
  name: w-istio-sidecar-injector-istio-system

webhooks:
- admissionReviewVersions:
  - v1beta1
  - v1
  clientConfig:
    service:
      name: istiod
      namespace: istio-system
      path: /inject

    validations:
      required: true
  - type: input
    id: gradle-old-version
    attributes:
      label: Gradle version that used to work
      description: What version of Gradle gives proper result for your case?
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: input
    id: build-scan-url
    attributes:
      label: Build scan URL (optional)
      description: |

    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: code-to-reproduce
    attributes:
      label: Standalone code to reproduce the issue
      description: Provide a reproducible test case that is the bare minimum necessary to generate the problem. Please share a link to Colab, Jupyter, or any notebook.
      placeholder: Tell us what you see!
      value:
      render: shell
    validations: