}

	table := tablewriter.NewWriter(os.Stdout)
	table.SetHeader([]string{"Name", "Value"})
	table.SetAutoWrapText(false)
	table.SetAutoFormatHeaders(true)
	table.SetHeaderAlignment(tablewriter.ALIGN_LEFT)
	table.SetAlignment(tablewriter.ALIGN_LEFT)
	table.SetCenterSeparator("")
	table.SetColumnSeparator("")
	table.SetRowSeparator("")
	table.SetHeaderLine(false)
	// table.EnableBorder(false)

	// ChecksumSHA256 indicates a SHA256 checksum.
	ChecksumSHA256
	// ChecksumSHA1 indicates a SHA-1 checksum.
	ChecksumSHA1
	// ChecksumCRC32 indicates a CRC32 checksum with IEEE table.
	ChecksumCRC32
	// ChecksumCRC32C indicates a CRC32 checksum with Castagnoli table.
	ChecksumCRC32C
	// ChecksumInvalid indicates an invalid checksum.
	ChecksumInvalid
	// ChecksumMultipart indicates the checksum is from a multipart upload.
	ChecksumMultipart

	errInvalidInternalSealAlgorithm = Errorf("The internal seal algorithm is invalid and not supported")
)

// errOutOfEntropy indicates that the a source of randomness (PRNG) wasn't able
// to produce enough random data. This is fatal error and should cause a panic.

The main difference between various MinIO-KMS deployments is the KMS implementation. The following table helps you select the right option for your use case:

| KMS                                                                                          | Purpose                                                           |

* Long-running requests with small/medium payloads.

Do *not* use the MinIO Grid for:

* Large payloads.

Only a single connection is ever made between two servers.
Likely this means that this connection will not be able to saturate network bandwidth.
Therefore, using this for large payloads will likely be slower than using a separate connection,
and other connections will be blocked while the large payload is being sent.

## Handlers & Routes

		c.Fatalf("Unable to set user: %v", err)
	}

	err = s.adm.SetPolicy(ctx, policy, accessKey, false)
	if err != nil {
		c.Fatalf("Unable to set policy: %v", err)
	}

	// confirm that the user is able to access the bucket
	uClient := s.getUserClient(c, accessKey, secretKey, "")
	versions := c.mustUploadReturnVersions(ctx, uClient, bucket)
	c.mustNotDelete(ctx, uClient, bucket, versions[0])

            "uid": "${DS_PROMETHEUS}"
          },
          "exemplar": true,
          "expr": "sum by (instance) (minio_s3_traffic_received_bytes{job=~\"$scrape_jobs\"})",
          "format": "table",
          "hide": false,
          "instant": false,
          "interval": "",
          "intervalFactor": 1,
          "legendFormat": "{{instance}}",
          "metric": "process_start_time_seconds",

				if err = s3Select.statement.AggregateRow(*inputRecord); err != nil {
					break OuterLoop
				}
			} else {
				var outputRecord sql.Record
				// We will attempt to reuse the records in the table.
				// The type of these should not change.
				// The queue should always have at least one entry left for this to work.
				outputQueue = outputQueue[:len(outputQueue)+1]

			a.Total = atomic.LoadInt64(&old.Total)
			a.N = atomic.LoadInt64(&old.N)
			e.mu.Lock()
			e.lastMinuteLatency.addAll(t-1, a)
			e.mu.Unlock()
			acc = newAcc
		} else {
			// We may be able to grab the new accumulator by yielding.
			runtime.Gosched()
			acc = e.cached.Load()
		}
	}
	atomic.AddInt64(&acc.N, 1)
	atomic.AddInt64(&acc.Total, int64(value))
	atomic.AddInt64(&acc.Size, sz)
}

	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal(err)
	}

	// Object was uploaded with 4 known bad drives, so we should still be able to lose 3 drives and still write to the object.
	erasureDisks = xl.getDisks()
	z.serverPools[0].erasureDisksMu.Lock()
	xl.getDisks = func() []StorageAPI {
		erasureDisks[7] = nil
		erasureDisks[8] = nil