27.0, depends on
    listenablefuture-9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava. The 9999.0-...
    version number is enough for some build systems (notably, Gradle) to select
    that empty artifact over the "real" listenablefuture-1.0 -- avoiding a
    conflict with the copy of ListenableFuture in guava itself. If users are

      <version>1.0.2</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>
      <artifactId>listenablefuture</artifactId>
      <version>9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.code.findbugs</groupId>
      <artifactId>jsr305</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>

            "requires": "1.0.2"
          }
        },
        {
          "group": "com.google.guava",
          "module": "listenablefuture",
          "version": {
            "requires": "9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava"
          }
        },
        {
          "group": "com.google.code.findbugs",
          "module": "jsr305",
          "version": {
            "requires": "${jsr305.version}"
          }

    while (itr.hasNext()) {
      Entry<K, V> entry = itr.next();
      K k = entry.getKey();
      V v = entry.getValue();
      K conflict = inverse.delegate.putIfAbsent(v, k);
      if (conflict != null) {
        broken = entry;
        // We're definitely going to throw, but we'll try to keep the BiMap in an internally
        // consistent state by removing the bad entry.

    27.0, depends on
    listenablefuture-9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava. The 9999.0-...
    version number is enough for some build systems (notably, Gradle) to select
    that empty artifact over the "real" listenablefuture-1.0 -- avoiding a
    conflict with the copy of ListenableFuture in guava itself. If users are

 */

package com.google.common.collect.testing.features;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.util.Set;

/**
 * Thrown when requirements on a tester method or class conflict with each other.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@GwtCompatible
public class ConflictingRequirementsException extends Exception {
  private Set<Feature<?>> conflicts;
  private Object source;

      <version>1.0.2</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>
      <artifactId>listenablefuture</artifactId>
      <version>9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.code.findbugs</groupId>
      <artifactId>jsr305</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>

   *     the array
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code array} is empty
   */
  @GwtIncompatible(
      "Available in GWT! Annotation is to avoid conflict with GWT specialization of base class.")
  public static double min(double... array) {
    checkArgument(array.length > 0);
    double min = array[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {

   *     the array
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code array} is empty
   */
  @GwtIncompatible(
      "Available in GWT! Annotation is to avoid conflict with GWT specialization of base class.")
  public static int min(int... array) {
    checkArgument(array.length > 0);
    int min = array[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {
      if (array[i] < min) {

     * platforms we target.
     *
     * 2. Kotlin's Map type has a getOrDefault method that accepts and returns a "plain V," in
     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the
     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls