* </p>
 * <p>
 * Wise voices have suggested that maybe aggregators shouldn't be bound to the ordinary
 * lifecycle at all, in which case we wouldn't be needing this class at all ( and
 * ProjectBuildList.getByTaskSegments). Or maybe they should be introduced in the calculation
 * of the execution plan instead, which seems much nicer.
 * </p>
 * <p>

  static final TempFileCreator INSTANCE = pickSecureCreator();

  /**
   * @throws IllegalStateException if the directory could not be created (to implement the contract
   *     of {@link Files#createTempDir()}, such as if the system does not support creating temporary
   *     directories securely
   */
  abstract File createTempDir();

  abstract File createTempFile(String prefix) throws IOException;

 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * ... produces output such as:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * Zachary: [Taylor]
 * John: [Adams, Adams, Tyler, Kennedy]  // Remember, Quincy!
 * George: [Washington, Bush, Bush]
 * Grover: [Cleveland, Cleveland]        // Two, non-consecutive terms, rep'ing NJ!
 * ...
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h3>Views</h3>
 *

 *   }
 * };
 * LoadingCache<Key, Graph> cache = CacheBuilder.newBuilder().build(loader);
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>Since this example doesn't support reloading or bulk loading, it can also be specified much
 * more simply:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * CacheLoader<Key, Graph> loader = CacheLoader.from(key -> createExpensiveGraph(key));
 * }</pre>
 *
 * @author Charles Fry
 * @since 10.0
 */

    Preconditions.checkElementIndex(index, length());
    return array[start + index];
  }

  /**
   * Returns the smallest index for which {@link #get} returns {@code target}, or {@code -1} if no
   * such index exists. Equivalent to {@code asList().indexOf(target)}.
   */
  public int indexOf(int target) {
    for (int i = start; i < end; i++) {
      if (array[i] == target) {
        return i - start;
      }

   * to reduce cache contention on most processors. Padding is
   * overkill for most Atomics because they are usually irregularly
   * scattered in memory and thus don't interfere much with each
   * other. But Atomic objects residing in arrays will tend to be
   * placed adjacent to each other, and so will most often share
   * cache lines (with a huge negative performance impact) without
   * this precaution.

    Preconditions.checkElementIndex(index, length());
    return array[start + index];
  }

  /**
   * Returns the smallest index for which {@link #get} returns {@code target}, or {@code -1} if no
   * such index exists. Values are compared as if by {@link Double#equals}. Equivalent to {@code
   * asList().indexOf(target)}.
   */
  public int indexOf(double target) {
    for (int i = start; i < end; i++) {

   * such as {@code removeAll()} and {@code clear()} are called on the filtered set, only elements
   * that satisfy the filter will be removed from the underlying set.
   *
   * <p>The returned set isn't threadsafe or serializable, even if {@code unfiltered} is.
   *
   * <p>Many of the filtered set's methods, such as {@code size()}, iterate across every element in

 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashSet}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger
 * than {@code size()}. Furthermore, this structure only depends on a fixed number of arrays; {@code
 * add(x)} operations <i>do not</i> create objects for the garbage collector to deal with, and for

   * equivalent (except in the case of overflow) to the call {@code
   * addAll(Collections.nCopies(element, occurrences))}, which would presumably perform much more
   * poorly.
   *
   * @param element the element to add occurrences of; may be null only if explicitly allowed by the
   *     implementation