* it is returned directly. Otherwise, a new array of size {@code minLength + padding} is
   * returned, containing the values of {@code array}, and zeroes in the remaining places.
   *
   * @param array the source array
   * @param minLength the minimum length the returned array must guarantee
   * @param padding an extra amount to "grow" the array by if growth is necessary

   * it is returned directly. Otherwise, a new array of size {@code minLength + padding} is
   * returned, containing the values of {@code array}, and zeroes in the remaining places.
   *
   * @param array the source array
   * @param minLength the minimum length the returned array must guarantee
   * @param padding an extra amount to "grow" the array by if growth is necessary

        .addEqualityGroup(Range.all(), Range.all())
        .addEqualityGroup("Phil")
        .testEquals();
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // TODO(b/148207871): Restore once Eclipse compiler no longer flakes for this.
  public void testLegacyComparable() {
    Range<LegacyComparable> range = Range.closed(LegacyComparable.X, LegacyComparable.Y);
  }

  private static final DiscreteDomain<Integer> UNBOUNDED_DOMAIN =

   * it is returned directly. Otherwise, a new array of size {@code minLength + padding} is
   * returned, containing the values of {@code array}, and zeroes in the remaining places.
   *
   * @param array the source array
   * @param minLength the minimum length the returned array must guarantee
   * @param padding an extra amount to "grow" the array by if growth is necessary

   * it is returned directly. Otherwise, a new array of size {@code minLength + padding} is
   * returned, containing the values of {@code array}, and zeroes in the remaining places.
   *
   * @param array the source array
   * @param minLength the minimum length the returned array must guarantee
   * @param padding an extra amount to "grow" the array by if growth is necessary

    assertEquals(0, (int) ictim.getInstance(Integer.class));
    assertEquals(1, (int) ictim.getInstance(int.class));
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // TODO(cpovirk): Can we at least use Class<?> in some places?
  abstract static class TestClassToInstanceMapGenerator implements TestMapGenerator<Class, Impl> {

    @Override
    public Class<?>[] createKeyArray(int length) {
      return new Class<?>[length];
    }

   * it is returned directly. Otherwise, a new array of size {@code minLength + padding} is
   * returned, containing the values of {@code array}, and zeroes in the remaining places.
   *
   * @param array the source array
   * @param minLength the minimum length the returned array must guarantee
   * @param padding an extra amount to "grow" the array by if growth is necessary

 * amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>This implementation consumes significantly less memory than {@code java.util.LinkedHashSet} or
 * even {@code java.util.HashSet}, and places considerably less load on the garbage collector. Like
 * {@code java.util.LinkedHashSet}, it offers insertion-order iteration, with identical behavior.
 *
 * <p>This class should not be assumed to be universally superior to {@code

  //
  // In the constructor of AbstractCatchingFuture, the delegate future is assigned to a field
  // 'inputFuture'. That field is non-final and non-volatile. There are 2 places where the
  // 'inputFuture' field is read and where we will have to consider visibility of the write
  // operation in the constructor.
  //

@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public abstract class ForwardingMapEntry<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
    extends ForwardingObject implements Map.Entry<K, V> {
  // TODO(lowasser): identify places where thread safety is actually lost

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected ForwardingMapEntry() {}

  @Override
  protected abstract Entry<K, V> delegate();

  @Override