return MinimalSet.of(elements);
              }
            })
        .named("MinimalSet")
        .withFeatures(
            CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES, CollectionFeature.NONE, CollectionSize.ANY)
        .createTestSuite();
  }

                  }
                }
                return MinimalCollection.of(elements);
              }
            })
        .named("MinimalCollection")
        .withFeatures(CollectionFeature.NONE, CollectionSize.ANY)
        .createTestSuite();
  }

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

                    return elements[index];
                  }
                };
              }
            })
        .named("AbstractList")
        .withFeatures(
            CollectionFeature.NONE, CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES, CollectionSize.ANY)
        .suppressing(suppressForAbstractList())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  public Test testsForAbstractSequentialList() {

    SerializableTester.reserializeAndAssert(Floats.stringConverter());
  }

  public void testToArray() {
    // need explicit type parameter to avoid javac warning!?
    List<Float> none = Arrays.<Float>asList();
    assertThat(Floats.toArray(none)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);

    List<Float> one = Arrays.asList((float) 1);
    assertThat(Floats.toArray(one)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);

    float[] array = {(float) 0, (float) 1, (float) 3};

    SerializableTester.reserializeAndAssert(Ints.stringConverter());
  }

  public void testToArray() {
    // need explicit type parameter to avoid javac warning!?
    List<Integer> none = Arrays.<Integer>asList();
    assertThat(Ints.toArray(none)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);

    List<Integer> one = Arrays.asList((int) 1);
    assertThat(Ints.toArray(one)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);

    int[] array = {(int) 0, (int) 1, (int) 0xdeadbeef};