assertEquals(pair.forward, copy.forward);
    assertEquals(pair.backward, copy.backward);
    assertSame(copy.backward, copy.forward.inverse());
    assertSame(copy.forward, copy.backward.inverse());
  }

  private static final class BiMapPair<K, V> implements Serializable {
    final BiMap<K, V> forward;
    final BiMap<V, K> backward;

    BiMapPair(BiMap<K, V> original) {
      this.forward = original;

    assertEquals(pair.forward, copy.forward);
    assertEquals(pair.backward, copy.backward);
    assertSame(copy.backward, copy.forward.inverse());
    assertSame(copy.forward, copy.backward.inverse());
  }

  private static final class BiMapPair<K, V> implements Serializable {
    final BiMap<K, V> forward;
    final BiMap<V, K> backward;

    BiMapPair(BiMap<K, V> original) {
      this.forward = original;

          public Integer apply(String input) {
            return Integer.parseInt(input);
          }
        };
    Function<Object, String> backward = toStringFunction();

    Converter<String, Number> converter = Converter.<String, Number>from(forward, backward);

    assertNull(converter.convert(null));
    assertNull(converter.reverse().convert(null));

    assertEquals((Integer) 5, converter.convert("5"));

        .containsExactly(Country.CANADA, Country.SWITZERLAND, Country.CHILE)
        .inOrder();
    // backward map ordered by country
    assertThat(bimap.inverse().keySet())
        .containsExactly(Country.CANADA, Country.CHILE, Country.SWITZERLAND)
        .inOrder();
    // backward map ordered by country (even for currency values)
    assertThat(bimap.inverse().values())

        .containsExactly(Country.CANADA, Country.SWITZERLAND, Country.CHILE)
        .inOrder();
    // backward map ordered by country
    assertThat(bimap.inverse().keySet())
        .containsExactly(Country.CANADA, Country.CHILE, Country.SWITZERLAND)
        .inOrder();
    // backward map ordered by country (even for currency values)
    assertThat(bimap.inverse().values())

         * for backward compatibility.
         *
         * @return true if caching is enabled, false otherwise
         */
        public boolean isCache() {
            for (final String value : values) {
                if ("cache".equalsIgnoreCase(value)) {
                    return true;
                }
            }
            // backward compatibility

      description: "Please also describe the change informally, as in a class teaching Go."
    validations:
      required: false

  - type: textarea
    id: go-backwards-compatiblity
    attributes:
      label: Is this change backward compatible?
      description: Breaking the Go 1 compatibility guarantee is a large cost and requires a large benefit.
      placeholder: |
       Yes or No

       If yes, 

    WRAPPER_TO_PRIMITIVE_TYPE = Collections.unmodifiableMap(wrapToPrim);
  }

  private static void add(
      Map<Class<?>, Class<?>> forward,
      Map<Class<?>, Class<?>> backward,
      Class<?> key,
      Class<?> value) {
    forward.put(key, value);
    backward.put(value, key);
  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable set of all nine primitive types (including {@code void}). Note that a

Yes, MinIO will try to transparently migrate any existing IAM data and either stores
it in plaintext (no KMS) or re-encrypts using the KMS.

> Is this change backward compatible? Will it break my setup?

This change is not backward compatible for all setups. In particular, the native
Hashicorp Vault integration - which has been deprecated already - won't be

import org.apache.maven.bridge.MavenRepositorySystem;
import org.apache.maven.plugin.LegacySupport;
import org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuilder;

/**
 * This realizes the metadata source via the default hint to provide backward-compat with Maven 2.x whose Plexus version
 * registered component descriptors twice: once keyed by role+roleHint and once keyed by role only. This effectively