} else if len(users2) != len(users) {
		t.Fatalf("Failed to load join users, got: %v, expect: %v", len(users2), len(users))
	}

	sort.Slice(users2, func(i, j int) bool {
		return users2[i].ID > users2[j].ID
	})

	sort.Slice(users, func(i, j int) bool {
		return users[i].ID > users[j].ID
	})

	for idx, user := range users {
		// user
		CheckUser(t, user, users2[idx])

	for cfgName, usersMap := range cfgToUsersMap {
		users := make([]madmin.OpenIDUserAccessKeys, 0, len(usersMap))
		for _, user := range usersMap {
			users = append(users, user)
		}
		sort.Slice(users, func(i, j int) bool {
			return users[i].MinioAccessKey < users[j].MinioAccessKey
		})
		resp = append(resp, madmin.ListAccessKeysOpenIDResp{
			ConfigName: cfgName,
			Users:      users,
		})
	}

  stars: 5751
  owner_login: serge-chat
  owner_html_url: https://github.com/serge-chat
- name: fastapi-users
  html_url: https://github.com/fastapi-users/fastapi-users
  stars: 5517
  owner_login: fastapi-users
  owner_html_url: https://github.com/fastapi-users
- name: strawberry
  html_url: https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry
  stars: 4392
  owner_login: strawberry-graphql

              <version>0.12.0</version>
              <!-- TODO(cpovirk): In principle, it would make sense to *also* test compatibility with JDK 1.8, since guava-android also has JRE users. -->
            </signature>
            <ignores>
              <!-- Unsafe isn't part of the documented Android API, but it is available.

	ctx := r.Context()

	objectAPI, _ := validateAdminReq(ctx, w, r, policy.RebalanceAdminAction)
	if objectAPI == nil {
		return
	}

	// Proxy rebalance-status to first pool first node, so that users see a
	// consistent view of rebalance progress even though different rebalancing
	// pools may temporarily have out of date info on the others.
	if ep := globalEndpoints[0].Endpoints[0]; !ep.IsLocal {

   * TypeVariableImpl}. Otherwise it throws {@link UnsupportedOperationException}; this should only
   * apply to {@code getAnnotatedBounds()}. This does mean that users on Java who obtain an instance
   * of {@code TypeVariable} from {@link TypeResolver#resolveType} will not be able to call {@code
   * getAnnotatedBounds()} on it, but that should hopefully be rare.
   *

      </plugin>
      <plugin>
        <artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
        <configuration>
          <excludes>
            <!-- 2. Don't include the source in the jar (since that would let users depend on it from GWT client code, which is compiled from source). -->
            <exclude>**/ForceGuavaCompilation*</exclude>
            <exclude>**/DummyJavadocClass*</exclude>
          </excludes>
        </configuration>

         * Android), the built-in TypeVariable's equals() method doesn't recognize instances of our
         * TypeVariable implementation. This is a problem because users compare TypeVariables from
         * the JDK against TypeVariables returned by TypeResolver. To work with all JDK versions,
         * TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable implementation in each of the three

      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>surefire.toolchain.version</name>
          <!-- the value provided by GitHub CI (which maybe we could even change, but supporting "8" seems nice for any users who try pass that value manually) -->
          <value>8</value>
        </property>
      </activation>
      <properties>
        <test.add.opens></test.add.opens>
      </properties>
    </profile>

	UserDefined         map[string]string   // only set in case of POST/PUT operations
	ObjectAttributes    map[string]struct{} // Attribute tags defined by the users for the GetObjectAttributes request
	MaxParts            int                 // used in GetObjectAttributes. Signals how many parts we should return