include:
          - os: windows-latest
            java: 21
            root-pom: pom.xml
    runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
    env:
      ROOT_POM: ${{ matrix.root-pom }}
    steps:
      # Cancel any previous runs for the same branch that are still running.
      - name: 'Cancel previous runs'
        uses: styfle/cancel-workflow-action@85880fa0301c86cca9da44039ee3bb12d3bedbfa # 0.12.1
        with:

      id-token: write
      # Uncomment the permissions below if installing in a private repository.
      # contents: read
      # actions: read

    steps:
      - name: "Checkout code"
        uses: actions/checkout@08c6903cd8c0fde910a37f88322edcfb5dd907a8 # v5.0.0
        with:
          persist-credentials: false

      - name: "Run analysis"

         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK
         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our

              }

              println("Authenticating for response: $response")
              println("Challenges: ${response.challenges()}")
              val credential = Credentials.basic("jesse", "password1")
              return response.request.newBuilder()
                  .header("Authorization", credential)
                  .build()
            }
          })
          .build()

              <groupId>com.toasttab.android</groupId>
              <artifactId>gummy-bears-api-23</artifactId>
              <version>0.12.0</version>
              <!-- TODO(cpovirk): In principle, it would make sense to *also* test compatibility with JDK 1.8, since guava-android also has JRE users. -->
            </signature>
            <ignores>
              <!-- Unsafe isn't part of the documented Android API, but it is available.

         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK
         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our