<artifactId>geo</artifactId>
				</exclusion>
			</exclusions>
		</dependency>
		<dependency>
			<groupId>org.codelibs.fesen.client</groupId>
			<artifactId>fesen-httpclient</artifactId>
			<version>${fesen.httpclient.version}</version>
		</dependency>
		<dependency>
			<groupId>org.ow2.asm</groupId>
			<artifactId>asm</artifactId>
			<version>${asm.version}</version>

import org.codelibs.core.io.ResourceUtil;
import org.codelibs.core.lang.StringUtil;
import org.codelibs.core.lang.ThreadUtil;
import org.codelibs.curl.CurlResponse;
import org.codelibs.fesen.client.EngineInfo;
import org.codelibs.fesen.client.HttpClient;
import org.codelibs.fess.Constants;
import org.codelibs.fess.app.web.base.login.FessLoginAssist;
import org.codelibs.fess.entity.FacetInfo;
import org.codelibs.fess.entity.GeoInfo;

         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK
         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our

              <groupId>com.toasttab.android</groupId>
              <artifactId>gummy-bears-api-23</artifactId>
              <version>0.12.0</version>
              <!-- TODO(cpovirk): In principle, it would make sense to *also* test compatibility with JDK 1.8, since guava-android also has JRE users. -->
            </signature>
            <ignores>
              <!-- Unsafe isn't part of the documented Android API, but it is available.

         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK
         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our