for (final String cmd : processedCommands) {
            assertFalse("Command should not contain ${url}", cmd.contains("${url}"));
            assertFalse("Command should not contain ${outputFile}", cmd.contains("${outputFile}"));
            assertTrue("Command should contain temp path", cmd.contains(tempPath));
            assertTrue("Command should contain output path", cmd.contains(outputPath));
        }
    }

                assertEquals("appendFesenStats should take StringBuilder parameter", 1, method.getParameterCount());
                assertEquals("appendFesenStats should take StringBuilder", StringBuilder.class, method.getParameterTypes()[0]);
                break;
            }
        }

        assertTrue("Should have appendOsStats method", hasAppendOsStats);
        assertTrue("Should have appendProcessStats method", hasAppendProcessStats);

         its builds. Thus, GWT doesn't get j2objc-annotations transitively, in
         contrast to the other deps of `guava`, which it does get transitively.
         (Arguably we should redeclare *all* the `guava` deps here.) -->
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.j2objc</groupId>
      <artifactId>j2objc-annotations</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>

    connection.calls.add(CallReference(this, callStackTrace))
  }

  /**
   * Releases resources held with the request or response of [exchange]. This should be called when
   * the request completes normally or when it fails due to an exception, in which case [e] should
   * be non-null.
   *
   * If the exchange was canceled or timed out, this will wrap [e] in an exception that provides

   * TypeVariableImpl}. Otherwise it throws {@link UnsupportedOperationException}; this should only
   * apply to {@code getAnnotatedBounds()}. This does mean that users on Java who obtain an instance
   * of {@code TypeVariable} from {@link TypeResolver#resolveType} will not be able to call {@code
   * getAnnotatedBounds()} on it, but that should hopefully be rare.
   *

  // This is needed when resolving types against a context with wildcards
  // For example:
  // class Holder<T> {
  //   void set(T data) {...}
  // }
  // Holder<List<?>> should *not* resolve the set() method to set(List<?> data).
  // Instead, it should create a capture of the wildcard so that set() rejects any List<T>.
  private static class WildcardCapturer {

    static final WildcardCapturer INSTANCE = new WildcardCapturer();

   * TypeVariableImpl}. Otherwise it throws {@link UnsupportedOperationException}; this should only
   * apply to {@code getAnnotatedBounds()}. This does mean that users on Java who obtain an instance
   * of {@code TypeVariable} from {@link TypeResolver#resolveType} will not be able to call {@code
   * getAnnotatedBounds()} on it, but that should hopefully be rare.
   *

  // This is needed when resolving types against a context with wildcards
  // For example:
  // class Holder<T> {
  //   void set(T data) {...}
  // }
  // Holder<List<?>> should *not* resolve the set() method to set(List<?> data).
  // Instead, it should create a capture of the wildcard so that set() rejects any List<T>.
  private static class WildcardCapturer {

    static final WildcardCapturer INSTANCE = new WildcardCapturer();

 *
 * The task runner is also responsible for releasing held threads when the library is unloaded.
 * This is for the benefit of container environments that implement code unloading.
 *
 * Most applications should share a process-wide [TaskRunner] and use queues for per-client work.
 */
class TaskRunner(
  val backend: Backend,
  internal val logger: Logger = TaskRunner.logger,
) : Lockable {
  private var nextQueueName = 10000

To cache responses, you'll need a cache directory that you can read and write to, and a limit on the cache's size. The cache directory should be private, and untrusted applications should not be able to read its contents!