* fingerprint at 4.0 microseconds and md5 at 4.5 microseconds.
 *
 * <p>Note to maintainers: This implementation relies on signed arithmetic being bit-wise equivalent
 * to unsigned arithmetic in all cases except:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>comparisons (signed values can be negative)
 *   <li>division (avoided here)
 *   <li>shifting (right shift must be unsigned)
 * </ul>

 * fingerprint at 4.0 microseconds and md5 at 4.5 microseconds.
 *
 * <p>Note to maintainers: This implementation relies on signed arithmetic being bit-wise equivalent
 * to unsigned arithmetic in all cases except:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>comparisons (signed values can be negative)
 *   <li>division (avoided here)
 *   <li>shifting (right shift must be unsigned)
 * </ul>

            switch (state) {
            case 0:
                if (in[i] != '/') {
                    // Checked exception (e.g. MalformedURLException) would be better
                    // but this would be a nightmare API wise
                    throw new RuntimeCIFSException("Invalid smb: URL: " + this.url);
                }
                out[prefixLen] = in[i];
                prefixLen++;
                state = 1;

   *
   * <p>This is designed for generating persistent fingerprints of strings. It isn't
   * cryptographically secure, but it produces a high-quality hash with few collisions. Fingerprints
   * generated using this are byte-wise identical to those created using the C++ version, but note
   * that this uses unsigned integers (see {@link com.google.common.primitives.UnsignedInts}).
   * Comparisons between the two should take this into account.
   *

   *
   * <p>This is designed for generating persistent fingerprints of strings. It isn't
   * cryptographically secure, but it produces a high-quality hash with few collisions. Fingerprints
   * generated using this are byte-wise identical to those created using the C++ version, but note
   * that this uses unsigned integers (see {@link com.google.common.primitives.UnsignedInts}).
   * Comparisons between the two should take this into account.
   *

Tí o kò bá mọ̀, ṣàyẹ̀wò ibi tí a ti ní _"In a hurry?"_ (i.e. _"Ní kíákíá?"_) nípa <a href="https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/async/#in-a-hurry" target="_blank">`async` and `await` nínú àkọsílẹ̀</a>.

</details>

### Mu ṣiṣẹ

Mú olupin ṣiṣẹ pẹ̀lú:

<div class="termy">

```console
$ uvicorn main:app --reload

INFO:     Uvicorn running on http://127.0.0.1:8000 (Press CTRL+C to quit)
INFO:     Started reloader process [28720]

Aber ich zeige Ihnen als nächstes, wie Sie das verbessern können. 🤓

## Benutzerdefinierte Operation-IDs und bessere Methodennamen

Sie können die Art und Weise, wie diese Operation-IDs **generiert** werden, **ändern**, um sie einfacher zu machen und **einfachere Methodennamen** in den Clients zu haben.

In diesem Fall müssen Sie auf andere Weise sicherstellen, dass jede Operation-ID **eindeutig** ist.

Heutzutage ist es nicht sehr populär und wird kaum verwendet.

OAuth2 spezifiziert nicht, wie die Kommunikation verschlüsselt werden soll, sondern erwartet, dass Ihre Anwendung mit HTTPS bereitgestellt wird.

/// tip | Tipp

Im Abschnitt über **Deployment** erfahren Sie, wie Sie HTTPS mithilfe von Traefik und Let's Encrypt kostenlos einrichten.

Dies steht im Gegensatz zu den Funktionen, die FastAPI für Sie aufruft: *Pfadoperation-Funktionen* und Abhängigkeiten.

            throw new SMBProtocolDecodingException("Signature verification failed for " + this.getClass().getName());
        }
        return len;
    }

    /**
     * Writes the AndX wire format to buffer
     * @param dst the destination buffer
     * @param dstIndex the starting index
     * @return the number of bytes written
     */