import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Experimental;
import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Immutable;

/**
 * Represents most common tools supported by CLIng.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Immutable
@Experimental
public final class Tools {
    private Tools() {}

    public static final String MVN_CMD = "mvn";
    public static final String MVN_NAME = "Maven";

## Tools {#tools}

### Go command {#go-command}

<!-- go.dev/issue/74667 -->
`cmd/doc`, and `go tool doc` have been deleted. `go doc` can be used as
a replacement for `go tool doc`: it takes the same flags and arguments and
has the same behavior.

    @Nonnull
    static Builder mvn(@Nonnull List<String> args, @Nonnull MessageBuilderFactory messageBuilderFactory) {
        return builder(Tools.MVN_CMD, Tools.MVN_NAME, args, messageBuilderFactory);
    }

    /**
     * Creates a new Builder instance for constructing a Maven Encrypting Tool ParserRequest.
     *
     * @param args the command-line arguments
     * @param messageBuilderFactory the factory for creating message builders

 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.api;

import javax.tools.DocumentationTool;
import javax.tools.JavaFileManager;
import javax.tools.StandardLocation;

import java.io.File;
import java.nio.file.Path;
import java.util.Objects;
import java.util.Optional;
import java.util.StringJoiner;

build:win_clang --extra_execution_platforms=//tensorflow/tools/toolchains/win:x64_windows-clang-cl
build:win_clang --host_platform=//tensorflow/tools/toolchains/win:x64_windows-clang-cl

build:windows_x86_cpu_2022 --config=win_clang_base
build:windows_x86_cpu_2022 --crosstool_top="//tensorflow/tools/toolchains/win2022/20241118:toolchain"
build:windows_x86_cpu_2022 --extra_toolchains="//tensorflow/tools/toolchains/win2022/20241118:cc-toolchain-x64_windows-clang-cl"

}

@test "API compatibility test passes, ensuring no unexpected changes to the TF API" {
    bazel test $TFCI_BAZEL_COMMON_ARGS //tensorflow/tools/api/tests:api_compatibility_test

## Previous tools { #previous-tools }

### <a href="https://www.djangoproject.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Django</a> { #django }

It's the most popular Python framework and is widely trusted. It is used to build systems like Instagram.

 *   <li>Dependency version management</li>
 *   <li>Configuration migration</li>
 *   <li>Interactive upgrade workflows</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNUP_CMD
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNUP_NAME
 * @since 4.0.0
 */

But in most of the cases where we need to do something like this, we want the model just to **filter/remove** some of the data as in this example.

And in those cases, we can use classes and inheritance to take advantage of function **type annotations** to get better support in the editor and tools, and still get the FastAPI **data filtering**.

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server