if (value instanceof final Number num) {
                    value = num.doubleValue();
                } else {
                    value = DfTypeUtil.toDouble(value.toString());
                }
            }
            return new Pair<>(key, value);
        }).collect(Collectors.toMap(Pair::getFirst, Pair::getSecond));
    }

   * garbage-collected, even if there are no more instances of FinalizableReferenceQueue itself.
   * The code in FinalizableReferenceQueue goes to considerable trouble to ensure that there are
   * no such references and the tests here check that that trouble has not been in vain.
   *
   * When we reference FinalizableReferenceQueue in this test, we are referencing a class that is

        context.details.allVariants {
            withDependencies {
                filter { it.group == "xml-apis" }.forEach {
                    it.version { require("1.4.01") }
                    it.because("Gradle has trouble with the versioning scheme and pom redirects in higher versions")
                }
            }
        }
    }
}


abstract class ReplaceCglibNodepWithCglibRule : ComponentMetadataRule {

[Gradle Community Resources](https://gradle.org/resources/).

This guide will help you to...

* maximize the chance of your changes being accepted
* work on the Gradle code base
* get help if you encounter trouble

## Before you start

Before starting to work on a feature or a bug fix, please open an issue to discuss the use case or bug with us. This can save everyone a lot of time and frustration.

```groovy
interface NestedType {
    Property<String> getSomeProperty()
}
class Example {
    Property<NestedType> getNestedProperty()
}
```

This is unnecessary because users will have trouble creating instances of `NestedType` and merging different instances of `NestedType`. It's also more awkward for users to access the properties in the nested property.

}

func (in *Input) Next() ScanToken {
	if in.peek {
		in.peek = false
		tok := in.peekToken
		in.text = in.peekText
		return tok
	}
	// If we cannot generate a token after 100 macro invocations, we're in trouble.
	// The usual case is caught by Push, below, but be safe.
	for nesting := 0; nesting < 100; {
		tok := in.Stack.Next()
		switch tok {
		case '#':
			if !in.beginningOfLine {

   *       collections intelligently fall back to a binary search tree if hash table collisions are
   *       detected. Rather than going to all the trouble of reimplementing this ourselves, we
   *       simply switch over to use the JDK implementation wholesale if probable hash flooding is
   *       detected, sacrificing the compactness guarantee in very rare cases in exchange for much

          <version>3.8.0</version>
          <configuration>
            <!-- TODO: b/286965322 - Use a newer version (probably the default toolchain we set up?) if it doesn't break Javadoc (including causing trouble for our later run of JDiff, which we do outside Maven, during snapshots/releases). -->
            <jdkToolchain>
              <version>11</version>
              <vendor>zulu</vendor>
            </jdkToolchain>

          <version>3.8.0</version>
          <configuration>
            <!-- TODO: b/286965322 - Use a newer version (probably the default toolchain we set up?) if it doesn't break Javadoc (including causing trouble for our later run of JDiff, which we do outside Maven, during snapshots/releases). -->
            <jdkToolchain>
              <version>11</version>
              <vendor>zulu</vendor>
            </jdkToolchain>

   *       collections intelligently fall back to a binary search tree if hash table collisions are
   *       detected. Rather than going to all the trouble of reimplementing this ourselves, we
   *       simply switch over to use the JDK implementation wholesale if probable hash flooding is
   *       detected, sacrificing the compactness guarantee in very rare cases in exchange for much