// Expected
            assertTrue(true);
        } else if (status == CrawlerStatus.DONE) {
            fail("Should not be DONE");
        }

        // Test with ternary operator
        String message = (status == CrawlerStatus.RUNNING) ? "Running" : "Not Running";
        assertEquals("Running", message);

        // Test with logical operators

    // being selected in phase 1
    checkState(boxedBoolean, "", (Object) boxedLong);

    // ternaries introduce their own problems. because of the ternary (which requires a boxing
    // operation) no overload can be selected in phase 1.  and in phase 2 it is ambiguous since it
    // matches with the second parameter being boxed and without it being boxed.  The cast to Object

    // being selected in phase 1
    checkState(boxedBoolean, "", (Object) boxedLong);

    // ternaries introduce their own problems. because of the ternary (which requires a boxing
    // operation) no overload can be selected in phase 1.  and in phase 2 it is ambiguous since it
    // matches with the second parameter being boxed and without it being boxed.  The cast to Object

   * Returns 1 if {@code x < y} as unsigned longs, and 0 otherwise. Assumes that x - y fits into a
   * signed long. The implementation is branch-free, and benchmarks suggest it is measurably faster
   * than the straightforward ternary expression.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting
  static int lessThanBranchFree(long x, long y) {
    // Returns the sign bit of x - y.
    return (int) (~~(x - y) >>> (Long.SIZE - 1));
  }

  /**

     * use `get(key) ?: defaultValue` instead of this method, anyway.
     */
    V result = get(key);
    // TODO(b/192579700): Use a ternary once it no longer confuses our nullness checker.
    if (result != null) {
      return result;
    } else {
      return defaultValue;
    }
  }

     * use `get(key) ?: defaultValue` instead of this method, anyway.
     */
    V result = get(key);
    // TODO(b/192579700): Use a ternary once it no longer confuses our nullness checker.
    if (result != null) {
      return result;
    } else {
      return defaultValue;
    }
  }

        }
        for (int i = count; i < size; i++) {
          array[i] = null; // for GWT
        }

        List<@Nullable T> list = unmodifiableList(asList(array));
        // TODO(b/192579700): Use a ternary once it no longer confuses our nullness checker.
        if (pad || count == size) {
          return list;
        } else {
          return list.subList(0, count);
        }
      }
    };
  }

Ajudando a responder as questões de varias pessoas, você pode se tornar um [Expert em FastAPI](fastapi-people.md#especialistas){.internal-link target=_blank} oficial. 🎉

## Acompanhe o repositório do GitHub

    url: https://github.com/oliverxchen
  - login: ternaus
    avatarUrl: https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5481618?u=513a26b02a39e7a28d587cd37c6cc877ea368e6e&v=4
    url: https://github.com/ternaus
  - login: eseglem
    avatarUrl: https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5920492?u=208d419cf667b8ac594c82a8db01932c7e50d057&v=4

Mas para o cliente gerado, poderíamos **modificar** os IDs de operação do OpenAPI logo antes de gerar os clientes, apenas para tornar esses nomes de método mais **simples**.

Poderíamos baixar o JSON do OpenAPI para um arquivo `openapi.json` e então poderíamos **remover essa tag prefixada** com um script como este: