removeWaiter(node);
                throw new InterruptedException();
              }

              // Otherwise re-read and check doneness. If we loop then it must have been a spurious
              // wakeup
              localValue = valueField;
              if (localValue != null & notInstanceOfDelegatingToFuture(localValue)) {
                return getDoneValue(localValue);
              }

                removeWaiter(node);
                throw new InterruptedException();
              }

              // Otherwise re-read and check doneness. If we loop then it must have been a spurious
              // wakeup
              localValue = valueField;
              if (localValue != null & notInstanceOfDelegatingToFuture(localValue)) {
                return getDoneValue(localValue);
              }

 * but given that any public suffix may become a host without warning, it is better to err on the
 * side of permissiveness and thus avoid spurious rejection of valid sites. Of course, to actually
 * determine addressability of any host, clients of this class will need to perform their own DNS
 * lookups.
 *
 * <p>During construction, names are normalized in two ways:

    RangeMap<Integer, Integer> copy = TreeRangeMap.copyOf(rangeMap);

    assertEquals(rangeMap.asMapOfRanges(), copy.asMapOfRanges());
  }

  // Overriding testEquals because it seems that we get spurious failures when it things empty
  // should be unequal to empty.
  public void testEquals() {
    TreeRangeMap<Integer, Integer> empty = TreeRangeMap.create();

    // This should wake up waiter1 and cause the waiter1 node to be removed.
    waiter1.interrupt();

    waiter1.join();
    waiter2.awaitWaiting(); // should still be blocked

    LockSupport.unpark(waiter2); // spurious wakeup
    waiter2.awaitWaiting(); // should eventually re-park

    future.set(null);
    waiter2.join();
  }

  public void testRemoveWaiter_polling() throws Exception {

    // This should wake up waiter1 and cause the waiter1 node to be removed.
    waiter1.interrupt();

    waiter1.join();
    waiter2.awaitWaiting(); // should still be blocked

    LockSupport.unpark(waiter2); // spurious wakeup
    waiter2.awaitWaiting(); // should eventually re-park

    future.set(null);
    waiter2.join();
  }

  public void testRemoveWaiter_polling() throws Exception {

		// regular ListObjects() calls. However for delete replication this
		// ends up being a problem because "upon" a successful delete this
		// ends up creating a new delete marker that is spurious and unnecessary.
		//
		// Regression introduced by #14555 was reintroduced in #15564
		if versionFound {
			if !goi.VersionPurgeStatus.Empty() {
				deleteMarker = false

- Fix bug where Server Side Apply causes spurious resourceVersion bumps on no-op patches to custom resources. ([#125263](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/125263), [@jpbetz](https://github.com/jpbetz)) [SIG API Machinery and Testing]

          //                ||----w |
          //                ||     ||
          // We need to clear the interrupted bit prior to calling park and maintain it in case we
          // wake up spuriously.
          restoreInterruptedBit = Thread.interrupted() || restoreInterruptedBit;
          LockSupport.park(blocker);
        }
      } else {
        Thread.yield();
      }
      state = get();
    }

    `@Deprecated` APIs will remain (again, unless they are `@Beta`). We have no
    plans to start removing things again, but officially, we're leaving our
    options open in case of surprises (like, say, a serious security problem).

3.  Guava has one dependency that is needed for linkage at runtime:
    `com.google.guava:failureaccess:1.0.3`. It also has
    [some annotation-only dependencies][guava-deps], which we discuss in more