"soy", "eres", "es", "somos", "sois", "son", "sea", "seas", "seamos", "seáis", "sean", "seré", "serás", "será", "seremos", "seréis", "serán", "sería", "serías", "seríamos", "seríais", "serían", "era", "eras", "éramos", "erais", "eran", "fui", "fuiste", "fue", "fuimos", "fuisteis", "fueron", "fuera", "fueras", "fuéramos", "fuerais", "fueran", "fuese", "fueses", "fuésemos", "fueseis", "fuesen", "siendo", "sido", "tengo", "tienes", "tiene", "tenemos", "tenéis", "tienen", "tenga", "tengas", "tengamos", "tengáis",...

  @SuppressWarnings({"GoodTime-ApiWithNumericTimeUnit", "GoodTime-DecomposeToPrimitive"})
  @IgnoreJRERequirement
  static long toNanosSaturated(Duration duration) {
    // Using a try/catch seems lazy, but the catch block will rarely get invoked (except for
    // durations longer than approximately +/- 292 years).
    try {
      return duration.toNanos();
    } catch (ArithmeticException tooBig) {

  }

  @Override
  protected Collection<Method> suppressForConcurrentHashMap() {
    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *

  @SuppressWarnings({"GoodTime-ApiWithNumericTimeUnit", "GoodTime-DecomposeToPrimitive"})
  @IgnoreJRERequirement
  static long toNanosSaturated(Duration duration) {
    // Using a try/catch seems lazy, but the catch block will rarely get invoked (except for
    // durations longer than approximately +/- 292 years).
    try {
      return duration.toNanos();
    } catch (ArithmeticException tooBig) {

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

  }

  @Override
  protected Collection<Method> suppressForConcurrentHashMap() {
    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

   * created arrays to have a {@code @Nullable} element type even when they're created directly with
   * {@code new ImmutableMapEntry[...]}, so it seems silly to insist on that only here.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // Safe as long as the javadocs are followed
  static <K, V> ImmutableMapEntry<K, V>[] createEntryArray(int size) {

        try (InputStreamReader reader = new InputStreamReader(byteSource.openStream(), cs)) {
          CharStreams.copy(reader, sb);
        }
        return sb.toString();
      }
    },
    // It really seems like this should be faster than TO_BYTE_ARRAY_NEW_STRING.  But it just isn't
    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this