assertSame(originalResponseBuffer, negotiation.getResponseRaw());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test buffer modifications are reflected")
    void testBufferModifications() {
        // Since the class returns the same array reference, modifications will be reflected
        byte[] requestBuffer = negotiation.getRequestRaw();
        byte[] responseBuffer = negotiation.getResponseRaw();

        // Modify the buffers

And whenever you update the backend code, and **regenerate** the frontend, it would have any new *path operations* available as methods, the old ones removed, and any other change would be reflected on the generated code. 🤓

This also means that if something changed, it will be **reflected** on the client code automatically. And if you **build** the client, it will error out if you have any **mismatch** in the data used.

allow for more staggered delay in terms of usage calculation. The scanner adapts to the system speed and completely pauses when the system is under load. It is possible to adjust the speed of the scanner and thereby the latency of updates being reflected. The delays between each operation of the scanner can be adjusted by the `mc admin config set alias/ delay=15.0`. By default the value is `10.0`. This means the scanner will sleep *10x* the time each operation takes.

In most setups this...

   *   System.out.println(transformed);
   * }
   *
   * ... prints {@code {a=[4, 16], b=[9, 9], c=[36]}}.
   *
   * <p>Changes in the underlying multimap are reflected in this view. Conversely, this view
   * supports removal operations, and these are reflected in the underlying multimap.
   *
   * <p>It's acceptable for the underlying multimap to contain null keys, and even null values

   * System.out.println(transformed);
   * }
   *
   * ... prints {@code {a=2.0, b=3.0}}.
   *
   * <p>Changes in the underlying map are reflected in this view. Conversely, this view supports
   * removal operations, and these are reflected in the underlying map.
   *
   * <p>It's acceptable for the underlying map to contain null keys, and even null values provided

   * System.out.println(transformed);
   * }
   *
   * ... prints {@code {a=2.0, b=3.0}}.
   *
   * <p>Changes in the underlying map are reflected in this view. Conversely, this view supports
   * removal operations, and these are reflected in the underlying map.
   *
   * <p>It's acceptable for the underlying map to contain null keys, and even null values provided

          parentBuilder) {
    // TODO: Once invariant support is added, supply invariants to each of the
    // derived suites, to check that mutations to the derived collections are
    // reflected in the underlying map.

    List<TestSuite> derivedSuites = super.createDerivedSuites(parentBuilder);

    if (parentBuilder.getFeatures().contains(CollectionFeature.SERIALIZABLE)) {
      derivedSuites.add(

   * of the table, such as iteration order, are left intact.
   *
   * <p>Changes in the underlying table are reflected in this view. Conversely, this view supports
   * removal operations, and these are reflected in the underlying table.
   *
   * <p>It's acceptable for the underlying table to contain null keys, and even null values provided

important exceptions.

Replication status on the source cluster will be marked as `COMPLETED` only after replication is completed on all targets. If one or more targets failed replication, the replication status is reflected as `PENDING`.

        // Setter should update the field
        transformer.setName("setterAccess");
        assertEquals("setterAccess", transformer.name);

        // Field modification should be reflected in getter
        transformer.name = "modifiedField";
        assertEquals("modifiedField", transformer.getName());
    }

    /**
     * Test name persistence across operations
     */