// not as the type of a variable.
type comparable interface{ comparable }

// iota is a predeclared identifier representing the untyped integer ordinal
// number of the current const specification in a (usually parenthesized)
// const declaration. It is zero-indexed.
const iota = 0 // Untyped int.

// nil is a predeclared identifier representing the zero value for a
// pointer, channel, func, interface, map, or slice type.

<code>real</code> and <code>imag</code> applied to a complex constant
and <code>complex</code> applied to numeric constants.
The boolean truth values are represented by the predeclared constants
<code>true</code> and <code>false</code>. The predeclared identifier
<a href="#Iota">iota</a> denotes an integer constant.
</p>

<p>
In general, complex constants are a form of
<a href="#Constant_expressions">constant expression</a>

<h3 id="symbols">Symbols</h3>

<p>
Some symbols, such as <code>R1</code> or <code>LR</code>,
are predefined and refer to registers.
The exact set depends on the architecture.
</p>

<p>
There are four predeclared symbols that refer to pseudo-registers.
These are not real registers, but rather virtual registers maintained by
the toolchain, such as a frame pointer.
The set of pseudo-registers is the same for all architectures:
</p>

    }

    @Override
    boolean isPartialView() {
      return true;
    }

    @Override
    public int size() {
      return map.size();
    }

    // redeclare to help optimizers with b/310253115
    @SuppressWarnings("RedundantOverride")
    @Override
    @J2ktIncompatible
    @GwtIncompatible
        Object writeReplace() {
      return super.writeReplace();
    }

        return entryList.get(index).getValue();
      }

      @Override
      ImmutableCollection<V> delegateCollection() {
        return ImmutableMapValues.this;
      }

      // redeclare to help optimizers with b/310253115
      @SuppressWarnings("RedundantOverride")
      @Override
      @J2ktIncompatible
      @GwtIncompatible
            Object writeReplace() {

      return index;
    } else {
      return size() - 1 - index;
    }
  }

  @Override
  boolean isPartialView() {
    return forward.isPartialView();
  }

  // redeclare to help optimizers with b/310253115
  @SuppressWarnings("RedundantOverride")
  @Override
  @J2ktIncompatible // serialization
  Object writeReplace() {
    return super.writeReplace();
  }

          }

          // redeclare to help optimizers with b/310253115
          @SuppressWarnings("RedundantOverride")
          @Override
          @J2ktIncompatible
          @GwtIncompatible
                    Object writeReplace() {
            return super.writeReplace();
          }
        };
      }

      // redeclare to help optimizers with b/310253115

Comme tous les **champs changent réellement** (le type inclut désormais `None` et ils ont maintenant une valeur par défaut de `None`), nous devons les **redéclarer**.

Nous n'avons pas vraiment besoin d'hériter de `HeroBase` puisque nous redéclarons tous les champs. Je le laisse hériter juste pour la cohérence, mais ce n'est pas nécessaire. C'est plutôt une question de goût personnel. 🤷

      entries.forEach(action);
    }

    @Override
    ImmutableList<Entry<K, V>> createAsList() {
      return new RegularImmutableAsList<>(this, entries);
    }

    // redeclare to help optimizers with b/310253115
    @SuppressWarnings("RedundantOverride")
    @Override
    @J2ktIncompatible
    @GwtIncompatible
        Object writeReplace() {
      return super.writeReplace();
    }
  }

    return false;
  }

  @Override
  public int hashCode() {
    return hashCode;
  }

  @Override
  boolean isHashCodeFast() {
    return true;
  }

  // redeclare to help optimizers with b/310253115
  @SuppressWarnings("RedundantOverride")
  @Override
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible
    Object writeReplace() {
    return super.writeReplace();
  }