}, {
		SQL:          "name1 = @name1 AND name2 = @name2 AND name3 = @name1",
		Vars:         []interface{}{sql.Named("name1", "jinzhu"), sql.Named("name2", "jinzhu2")},
		Result:       "name1 = ? AND name2 = ? AND name3 = ?",
		ExpectedVars: []interface{}{"jinzhu", "jinzhu2", "jinzhu"},
	}, {
		SQL:          "name1 = @name1 AND name2 = @name2 AND name3 = @name1",
		Vars:         []interface{}{map[string]interface{}{"name1": "jinzhu", "name2": "jinzhu2"}},

	}
	for i := riscv.REG_F0; i <= riscv.REG_F31; i++ {
		name := fmt.Sprintf("F%d", i-riscv.REG_F0)
		register[name] = int16(i)
	}
	for i := riscv.REG_V0; i <= riscv.REG_V31; i++ {
		name := fmt.Sprintf("V%d", i-riscv.REG_V0)
		register[name] = int16(i)
	}

	// General registers with ABI names.
	register["ZERO"] = riscv.REG_ZERO
	register["RA"] = riscv.REG_RA
	register["SP"] = riscv.REG_SP

In this case, you have:

* `ItemsService`
* `UsersService`

### Client Method Names { #client-method-names }

Right now, the generated method names like `createItemItemsPost` don't look very clean:

```TypeScript
ItemsService.createItemItemsPost({name: "Plumbus", price: 5})
```

func ParseTagSetting(str string, sep string) map[string]string {
	settings := map[string]string{}
	names := strings.Split(str, sep)

	var parsedNames []string
	for i := 0; i < len(names); i++ {
		s := names[i]
		for strings.HasSuffix(s, "\\") && i+1 < len(names) {
			i++
			s = s[:len(s)-1] + sep + names[i]
		}
		parsedNames = append(parsedNames, s)
	}

	for _, tag := range parsedNames {

  goreposum computes a checksum of all the named state in the remote repo.
  It hashes together all the branch names and hashes
  and then all the bookmark names and hashes.
  Tags are stored in .hgtags files in any of the branches,
  so the branch metadata includes the tags as well.
  """
  h = hashlib.sha256()
  peer = hg.peer(ui, {}, url)
  for name, revs in peer.branchmap().items():
    h.update(name)
    for r in revs:
      h.update(b' ')

	if len(results) != 2 {
		t.Errorf("expected 2 distinct names, got %d", len(results))
	}

	var names []string
	for _, u := range results {
		names = append(names, u.Name)
	}
	sort.Strings(names)
	expected := []string{"GenericsDistinctDup", "GenericsDistinctUnique"}
	if !reflect.DeepEqual(names, expected) {
		t.Errorf("expected names %v, got %v", expected, names)
	}
}

func TestGenericsSetCreate(t *testing.T) {

Keep class names, function names, modules, file names, and CLI commands unchanged.

### List of English terms and their preferred French translations

                public Collection<Phase> phases() {
                    List<String> names = lifecycle.getPhases();
                    List<Phase> phases = new ArrayList<>();
                    for (int i = 0; i < names.size(); i++) {
                        String name = names.get(i);
                        String prev = i > 0 ? names.get(i - 1) : null;
                        phases.add(new Phase() {

std::vector<string> GetFuncNames(const tensorflow::GraphDef& graph_def) {
  std::vector<string> names;
  auto functions = graph_def.library().function();
  names.reserve(functions.size());
  for (const tensorflow::FunctionDef& func : functions) {
    names.push_back(func.signature().name());
  }
  std::sort(names.begin(), names.end());
  return names;
}

CSession::CSession(TF_Graph* graph, TF_Status* s, bool use_XLA) {

* **Harder code search and refactoring**: Searching for identifiers, method names, or documentation becomes more difficult when multiple spellings exist for the same concept
* **Inconsistent API surface**: Public APIs with mixed spelling conventions appear less professional and polished