String[] loggerNames = { "test.logger", "another.logger" };
        ErrorToWarnRewritePolicy policy = new ErrorToWarnRewritePolicy(loggerNames);

        assertNotNull(policy);
    }

    @Test
    public void test_rewrite_with_null_logger_name() {
        String[] loggerNames = { "test.logger" };
        ErrorToWarnRewritePolicy policy = new ErrorToWarnRewritePolicy(loggerNames);

        LogEvent event =

                }
            }
        }
    }
}

fun ScheduleTrigger.scheduledTrigger(
    branch: VersionedSettingsBranch,
    policy: SchedulingPolicy,
    pendingChangesOnly: Boolean,
) {
    schedulingPolicy = policy
    triggerBuild = always()
    withPendingChangesOnly = pendingChangesOnly
    enabled = true

   * The HTTP <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/permissions-policy-1/">{@code Permissions-Policy}</a>
   * header field name.
   *
   * @since 31.0
   */
  public static final String PERMISSIONS_POLICY = "Permissions-Policy";

  /**
   * The HTTP <a
   * href="https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-permissions-policy/#permissions-policy-report-only-http-header-field">{@code
   * Permissions-Policy-Report-Only}</a> header field name.
   *

    }
  }

  //////// Implementation /////////

  private static final LazyLogger logger = new LazyLogger(CycleDetectingLockFactory.class);

  final Policy policy;

  private CycleDetectingLockFactory(Policy policy) {
    this.policy = checkNotNull(policy);
  }

  /**
   * Tracks the currently acquired locks for each Thread, kept up to date by calls to {@link

# Policy on AI-Assisted Contributions to the Gradle Build Tool

We use AI tools daily and welcome AI-assisted contributions—provided the human behind them meets the standards below.

## Why this policy exists

There is a fundamental **asymmetry** between submitting a contribution and reviewing one: AI tools make it easy to generate and submit large amounts of code, but they do not make it equally faster for us to review it. 

  private <E extends Enum<E>>
      CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E> newInstanceWithExplicitOrdering(
          Class<E> enumClass, Policy policy) {
    return new CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E>(
        policy, CycleDetectingLockFactory.createNodes(enumClass));
  }

  public void testDeadlock_twoLocks() {
    // Establish an acquisition order of lockA -> lockB.
    lockA.lock();

  private <E extends Enum<E>>
      CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E> newInstanceWithExplicitOrdering(
          Class<E> enumClass, Policy policy) {
    return new CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E>(
        policy, CycleDetectingLockFactory.createNodes(enumClass));
  }

  public void testDeadlock_twoLocks() {
    // Establish an acquisition order of lockA -> lockB.
    lockA.lock();

  private fun Sink.withThrottlingAndSocketEffect(
    policy: MockResponse,
    socketEffect: SocketEffect?,
    expectedByteCount: Long,
    socket: MockWebServerSocket,
    stream: Http2Stream? = null,
  ): Sink {
    var result: Sink = this

    if (policy.throttlePeriodNanos > 0L) {
      result =
        ThrottledSink(
          socket = socket,

# SHA256 checksums of snapshot zip files in this directory.
# These checksums are included in the FIPS security policy
# (validation instructions sent to the lab) and MUST NOT CHANGE.
# That is, the zip files themselves must not change.
#
# It is okay to add new zip files to the list, and it is okay to
# remove zip files from the list when they are removed from
# this directory. To update this file:
#
#	go test cmd/go/internal/fips140 -update
#

 * Attempts to {@code put} an element into a full queue will result in the operation blocking;
 * attempts to {@code take} an element from an empty queue will similarly block.
 *
 * <p>This class supports an optional fairness policy for ordering waiting producer and consumer
 * threads. By default, this ordering is not guaranteed. However, a queue constructed with fairness