eventSource: EventSource,
    response: Response,
  ) {
  }

  /**
   * Invoked when a new event has been sent to the client.
   *
   * @param id The `id` line of the event, might be null.
   * @param type The `event` line of the event, might be null.
   * @param data The `data` line of the event.
   */
  open fun onEvent(
    eventSource: EventSource,
    id: String?,
    type: String?,
    data: String,
  ) {
  }

 */
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion

    }
    assertNull(
        "The array element immediately following the end of the collection should be nulled",
        array[getNumElements()]);
    // array[getNumElements() + 1] might or might not have been nulled
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(KNOWN_ORDER)
  public void testToArray_oversizedArray_ordered() {
    E[] array = getSubjectGenerator().createArray(getNumElements() + 2);

   * code would be responsible for populating a "real" {@code T} (which might still be the value
   * {@code null}!) before returning it to callers. Depending on how the code is structured, a
   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem
   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *

 */
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion

    if (supportsRemove) {
      // We use a copy of "entryToRemove" in the assertion because "entryToRemove" might be
      // invalidated and have undefined behavior after entrySet.removeAll(entriesToRemove),
      // for example entryToRemove.getValue() might be null.
      Entry<K, V> entryToRemoveCopy = mapEntry(entryToRemove.getKey(), entryToRemove.getValue());

      int initialSize = map.size();

        assertNotNull(toString);
        assertTrue("toString should contain TimeZone ID", toString.contains(FessUserTimeZoneProcessProvider.centralTimeZone.getID()));
        // The provider's toString might not contain the exact class name
        // Just verify it's not null and contains some meaningful info
        assertTrue("toString should not be empty", toString.length() > 0);
    }

   * code would be responsible for populating a "real" {@code T} (which might still be the value
   * {@code null}!) before returning it to callers. Depending on how the code is structured, a
   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem
   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *

  private static final int MAX_BUSY_WAIT_SPINS = 1000;

  @Override
  public final void run() {
    /*
     * Set runner thread before checking isDone(). If we were to check isDone() first, the task
     * might be cancelled before we set the runner thread. That would make it impossible to
     * interrupt, yet it will still run, since interruptTask will leave the runner value null,
     * allowing the CAS below to succeed.
     */

   * stream is longer, its extra elements will be ignored.
   *
   * <p>Note that if you are calling {@link Stream#forEach} on the resulting stream, you might want
   * to consider using {@link #forEachPair} instead of this method.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> The resulting stream is not <a