import java.lang.annotation.Target;

import org.codelibs.core.lang.StringUtil;

import jakarta.validation.Constraint;
import jakarta.validation.Payload;

/**
 * Validation constraint for custom size limits based on configuration keys.
 */
@Target({ METHOD, FIELD, ANNOTATION_TYPE, CONSTRUCTOR, PARAMETER })
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Documented
@Constraint(validatedBy = CustomSizeValidator.class)
public @interface CustomSize {

        field = maxRequests
      }
      promoteAndExecute()
    }

  /**
   * The maximum number of requests for each host to execute concurrently. This limits requests by
   * the URL's host name. Note that concurrent requests to a single IP address may still exceed this
   * limit: multiple hostnames may share an IP address or be routed through the same HTTP proxy.
   *

 * or network should be done asynchronously.
 */
abstract class EventListener {
  /**
   * Invoked as soon as a call is enqueued or executed by a client. In case of thread or stream
   * limits, this call may be executed well before processing the request is able to begin.
   *
   * This will be invoked only once for a single [Call]. Retries of different routes or redirects

 * This callback processes file events (create, modify, delete) and manages document indexing and deletion
 * operations in the search engine. It supports recursive crawling with configurable depth and access count limits.
 *
 * <p>The implementation uses an executor service for concurrent processing of file operations and maintains
 * a cache of URLs to be deleted for batch processing. It handles redirect following and child URL discovery

 * handles timeout scenarios, and ensures proper cleanup of resources.</p>
 *
 * <p>Key features:</p>
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Concurrent crawler process management with configurable limits</li>
 *   <li>Selective crawling based on configuration IDs</li>
 *   <li>Document expiration handling</li>
 *   <li>Hot thread monitoring for performance analysis</li>
 *   <li>Process isolation with separate JVM</li>

         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {
          validClasses.clear();
        }

        validClasses.add(new WeakReference<Class<? extends Exception>>(exceptionClass));
      }
    }

  - Added validation to enforce the hugepage aggregated container limits to be smaller than or equal to pod-level limits. This was already enforced with the defaulted requests from the specified limits, however it did not make it clear about both hugepage requests and limits. ([#131089](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/131089), [@KevinTMtz](https://github.com/KevinTMtz)) [SIG Apps, Node and Testing]

 * response body. Each response body is supported by an active connection to the webserver. This
 * imposes both obligations and limits on the client application.
 *
 * ### The response body must be closed.
 *
 * Each response body is backed by a limited resource like a socket (live network responses) or
 * an open file (for cached responses). Failing to close the response body will leak resources and

   *
   * <p>Note that the cache <b>may evict an entry before this limit is exceeded</b>. For example, in
   * the current implementation, when {@code concurrencyLevel} is greater than {@code 1}, each
   * resulting segment inside the cache <i>independently</i> limits its own size to approximately
   * {@code maximumSize / concurrencyLevel}.
   *

        br.addElement("Against for CVE-2014-0050 (JVN14876762).");
        br.addElement("Boundary size is limited by Framework.");
        br.addElement("Too long boundary is treated as 404 because it's thought of as attack.");
        br.addElement("");
        br.addElement("While, you can override the boundary limit size");
        br.addElement(" in " + getClass().getSimpleName() + ".");
        br.addItem("Content Type");