},
        "danish_keywords": {
          "type":       "keyword_marker",

   * know that calling {@code clone()} during deserialization will return an
   * object that no one else has a reference to, allowing us to guarantee
   * immutability. Hence, we support only {@link EnumSet}.
   */
  private final transient EnumSet<E> delegate;

  private ImmutableEnumSet(EnumSet<E> delegate) {
    this.delegate = delegate;
  }

  @Override

  /**
   * Closed addressing tends to perform well even with high load factors. Being conservative here
   * ensures that the table is still likely to be relatively sparse (hence it misses fast) while
   * saving space.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting static final double MAX_LOAD_FACTOR = 1.2;

  /**
   * Maximum allowed false positive probability of detecting a hash flooding attack given random

         * Breaking AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater not only forces AggregateFutureState to fall back to
         * another implementation but also forces AbstractFutureState to be able to do the
         * same—hence the try-catch here.
         *
         * (Really, we're fortunate that breaking AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater doesn't break _even
         * more_ things.)
         */
        helper = new SynchronizedHelper();

    checkEntry(entry2, "custom-baz", "custom-header", 55)

    // Once a header field is decoded and added to the reconstructed header
    // list, it cannot be removed from it. Hence, foo is here.
    assertThat(hpackReader!!.getAndResetHeaderList()).isEqualTo(headerBlock)

    // Simulate receiving a small dynamic table size update, that implies eviction.

  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@code PeekingIterator} backed by the given iterator.
   *
   * <p>Calls to the {@code peek} method with no intervening calls to {@code next} do not affect the
   * iteration, and hence return the same object each time. A subsequent call to {@code next} is
   * guaranteed to return the same object again. For example:
   *
   * {@snippet :
   * PeekingIterator<String> peekingIterator =

  if they're rejected by PreEnqueue plugins that could change its result by a change in resources apart from Pods.
  
  DRA plugin is the only plugin that meets the criteria of the bug in in-tree, 
  and hence if you have `DynamicResourceAllocation` feature flag enabled, 

  if they're rejected by PreEnqueue plugins that could change its result by a change in resources apart from Pods.
  
  DRA plugin is the only plugin that meets the criteria of the bug in in-tree, 
  and hence if you have `DynamicResourceAllocation` feature flag enabled, 

  if they're rejected by PreEnqueue plugins that could change its result by a change in resources apart from Pods.
  
  DRA plugin is the only plugin that meets the criteria of the bug in in-tree, 
  and hence if you have `DynamicResourceAllocation` feature flag enabled,