<!--- Provide a general summary of the issue in the Title above -->

## Expected Behavior
<!--- If you're describing a bug, tell us what should happen -->
<!--- If you're suggesting a change/improvement, tell us how it should work -->

## Current Behavior
<!--- If describing a bug, tell us what happens instead of the expected behavior -->
<!--- If suggesting a change/improvement, explain the difference from current behavior -->

## Possible Solution

 * cancelled).
 *
 * <p>This class serializes execution of <i>submitted</i> tasks but not any <i>listeners</i> of
 * those tasks.
 *
 * <p>Submitted tasks have a happens-before order as defined in the Java Language Specification.
 * Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function calls to {@link #submit} and
 * {@link #submitAsync} that submitted those tasks had.
 *

  }

  /**
   * It's possible a self-terminating deflated message will contain trailing data that won't be
   * processed during inflation. If this happens, we need to either reject the message or discard
   * the unreachable data. We choose to discard it!
   *
   * In practice this could happen if the encoder doesn't strip the [0x00, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff] suffix
   * and that ends up repeated.
   *
   * https://github.com/square/okhttp/issues/8551

 * cancelled).
 *
 * <p>This class serializes execution of <i>submitted</i> tasks but not any <i>listeners</i> of
 * those tasks.
 *
 * <p>Submitted tasks have a happens-before order as defined in the Java Language Specification.
 * Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function calls to {@link #submit} and
 * {@link #submitAsync} that submitted those tasks had.
 *

* Certificates have a **lifetime**.
    * They **expire**.
    * And then they need to be **renewed**, **acquired again** from the third party.
* The encryption of the connection happens at the **TCP level**.
    * That's one layer **below HTTP**.
    * So, the **certificate and encryption** handling is done **before HTTP**.
* **TCP doesn't know about "domains"**. Only about IP addresses.

   * are running concurrently.
   *
   * <p>{@linkplain Executor#execute executed} tasks have a happens-before order as defined in the
   * Java Language Specification. Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function
   * calls to {@link Executor#execute execute()} that submitted those tasks had.
   *

    Striped<Lock> stripedLock = Striped.lazyWeakLock(Integer.MAX_VALUE);
    for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
      stripedLock.get(new Object()).lock();
      // nothing special (e.g. an exception) happens
    }
  }

  public void testBulkGetReturnsSorted() {
    for (Striped<?> striped : allImplementations()) {
      Map<Object, Integer> indexByLock = new HashMap<>();

    Striped<Lock> stripedLock = Striped.lazyWeakLock(Integer.MAX_VALUE);
    for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
      stripedLock.get(new Object()).lock();
      // nothing special (e.g. an exception) happens
    }
  }

  public void testBulkGetReturnsSorted() {
    for (Striped<?> striped : allImplementations()) {
      Map<Object, Integer> indexByLock = new HashMap<>();

In discussions and PRs, in many cases, people bring their frustration and show it without filter, in many cases exaggerating, complaining, being entitled, etc. That's really not nice, and when it happens, it lowers our priority to solve their problems. But still, try to breath, and be gentle with your answers.

        session.release();

        // Then - Trees should be cleared (we can't directly verify as it's internal,
        // but the cleanup code with synchronized block ensures it happens atomically)
        // The important part is that no exception occurs and the operation is atomic
    }

    /**
     * Test concurrent acquire and release operations.
     */
    @Test