/*
     * If greatestOf() promised to be implemented as reverse().leastOf(), this
     * test would be enough. It doesn't... but we'll cheat and act like it does
     * anyway. There's a comment there to remind us to fix this if we change it.
     */
    List<Integer> list = asList(3, 1, 3, 2, 4, 2, 4, 3);
    assertEquals(asList(4, 4, 3, 3), numberOrdering.greatestOf(list, 4));
  }

    /*
     * If greatestOf() promised to be implemented as reverse().leastOf(), this
     * test would be enough. It doesn't... but we'll cheat and act like it does
     * anyway. There's a comment there to remind us to fix this if we change it.
     */
    List<Integer> list = asList(3, 1, 3, 2, 4, 2, 4, 3);
    assertEquals(asList(4, 4, 3, 3), numberOrdering.greatestOf(list, 4));
  }

   * thisComparator))} instead.
   *
   * @return an immutable {@code RandomAccess} list of the {@code k} greatest elements in
   *     <i>descending order</i>
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code k} is negative
   * @since 8.0
   */
  public <E extends T> List<E> greatestOf(Iterable<E> iterable, int k) {

   * thisComparator))} instead.
   *
   * @return an immutable {@code RandomAccess} list of the {@code k} greatest elements in
   *     <i>descending order</i>
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code k} is negative
   * @since 8.0
   */
  public <E extends T> List<E> greatestOf(Iterable<E> iterable, int k) {

            new int[] {LEAST, (int) 1L},
            new int[] {(int) 1L},
            new int[] {(int) 1L, LEAST},
            new int[] {GREATEST, (GREATEST - (int) 1L)},
            new int[] {GREATEST, GREATEST},
            new int[] {GREATEST, GREATEST, GREATEST});

    Comparator<int[]> comparator = UnsignedInts.lexicographicalComparator();
    Helpers.testComparator(comparator, ordered);
  }

            new byte[] {LEAST, (byte) 1},
            new byte[] {(byte) 1},
            new byte[] {(byte) 1, LEAST},
            new byte[] {GREATEST, GREATEST - (byte) 1},
            new byte[] {GREATEST, GREATEST},
            new byte[] {GREATEST, GREATEST, GREATEST});

    // The Unsafe implementation if it's available. Otherwise, the Java implementation.

            new int[] {LEAST, (int) 1},
            new int[] {(int) 1},
            new int[] {(int) 1, LEAST},
            new int[] {GREATEST, GREATEST - (int) 1},
            new int[] {GREATEST, GREATEST},
            new int[] {GREATEST, GREATEST, GREATEST});

    Comparator<int[]> comparator = Ints.lexicographicalComparator();
    Helpers.testComparator(comparator, ordered);
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible

            new char[] {LEAST, (char) 1},
            new char[] {(char) 1},
            new char[] {(char) 1, LEAST},
            new char[] {GREATEST, GREATEST - (char) 1},
            new char[] {GREATEST, GREATEST},
            new char[] {GREATEST, GREATEST, GREATEST});

    Comparator<char[]> comparator = Chars.lexicographicalComparator();
    Helpers.testComparator(comparator, ordered);
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible

 * #removeLast} are also provided, to act on the <i>greatest</i> element in the queue instead.
 *
 * <p>A min-max priority queue can be configured with a maximum size. If so, each time the size of
 * the queue exceeds that value, the queue automatically removes its greatest element according to
 * its comparator (which might be the element that was just added). This is different from

            new double[] {LEAST, (double) 1},
            new double[] {(double) 1},
            new double[] {(double) 1, LEAST},
            new double[] {GREATEST, Double.MAX_VALUE},
            new double[] {GREATEST, GREATEST},
            new double[] {GREATEST, GREATEST, GREATEST});

    Comparator<double[]> comparator = Doubles.lexicographicalComparator();
    Helpers.testComparator(comparator, ordered);
  }