/**
 * A test which demonstrates maven's recursive inheritance where
 * we are testing to make sure that elements stated in a model are
 * not clobbered by the same elements elsewhere in the lineage.
 *
 */
@Deprecated
class ProjectInheritanceTest extends AbstractProjectInheritanceTestCase {
    // ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    //

      for (int i = 0; i < expected.length; i++) {
        assertEquals(expected[i], got[i]);
      }
    }
  }

  // Assumes that AbstractNonStreamingHashFunction works properly (must be tested elsewhere!)
  private static class Control extends AbstractNonStreamingHashFunction {
    @Override
    public HashCode hashBytes(byte[] input, int off, int len) {

import (
	"net/http"

	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/logger"
	"github.com/minio/mux"
	"github.com/minio/pkg/v3/policy"
)

// Data types used for returning dummy tagging XML.
// These variables shouldn't be used elsewhere.
// They are only defined to be used in this file alone.

// GetBucketWebsite  - GET bucket website, a dummy api
func (api objectAPIHandlers) GetBucketWebsiteHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {

existingThing = objects.newInstance(DefaultExistingThing.class)
existingThing.convention("some-value")
```

It's not acceptable to treat an unset Provider as if the convention is requested when the convention could be set elsewhere:

```groovy
public interface NewThing {
    Property<String> getSomeProperty()
}

// Unacceptable
String value
if (!getSomeProperty().isPresent()) {
   value = "convention"
} else {

      for (int i = 0; i < expected.length; i++) {
        assertEquals(expected[i], got[i]);
      }
    }
  }

  // Assumes that AbstractNonStreamingHashFunction works properly (must be tested elsewhere!)
  private static class Control extends AbstractNonStreamingHashFunction {
    @Override
    public HashCode hashBytes(byte[] input, int off, int len) {

	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/logger"
	"github.com/minio/mux"
	"github.com/minio/pkg/v3/policy"
)

// Data types used for returning dummy access control
// policy XML, these variables shouldn't be used elsewhere
// they are only defined to be used in this file alone.
type grantee struct {
	XMLNS       string `xml:"xmlns:xsi,attr"`
	XMLXSI      string `xml:"xsi:type,attr"`
	Type        string `xml:"Type"`

        newTop.totalCount = totalCount - oldElemCount;
        return newTop.rebalance();
      }
    }

    // Removes the minimum node from this subtree to be reused elsewhere
    @CheckForNull
    private AvlNode<E> removeMin(AvlNode<E> node) {
      if (left == null) {
        return right;
      } else {
        left = left.removeMin(node);
        distinctElements--;

        newTop.totalCount = totalCount - oldElemCount;
        return newTop.rebalance();
      }
    }

    // Removes the minimum node from this subtree to be reused elsewhere
    @CheckForNull
    private AvlNode<E> removeMin(AvlNode<E> node) {
      if (left == null) {
        return right;
      } else {
        left = left.removeMin(node);
        distinctElements--;

    }

    @Override
    public OneSizeTestContainerGenerator<Map<K, V>, Entry<K, V>> getInnerGenerator() {
      return mapGenerator;
    }
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): could something like this be used elsewhere, e.g., ReserializedListGenerator?
  static class ForwardingTestMapGenerator<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      implements TestMapGenerator<K, V> {
    TestMapGenerator<K, V> delegate;

        VersionRange mergedRange = range1.restrict(range2);
        // TODO current policy is to retain the original version - is this correct, do we need strategies or is that
        // handled elsewhere?
        //        assertEquals( "1.1", mergedRange.getRecommendedVersion().toString(), CHECK_VERSION_RECOMMENDATION );
        assertEquals("1.0", mergedRange.getRecommendedVersion().toString(), CHECK_VERSION_RECOMMENDATION);