### Quotes

- Keep quote style consistent with existing Turkish docs (typically ASCII quotes in text).
- Never modify quotes inside inline code, code blocks, URLs, or file paths.

### Ellipsis

- Keep ellipsis style (`...`) consistent with existing Turkish docs.
- Never modify `...` in code, URLs, or CLI examples.

### Consistency

- Use the same translation for the same term throughout the document.

- Do not add trailing punctuation to headings.

### Quotes

- Keep quote style consistent with the existing Korean docs.
- Never change quotes inside inline code, code blocks, URLs, or file paths.

### Ellipsis

- Keep ellipsis style consistent with existing Korean docs (often `...`).
- Never change `...` in code, URLs, or CLI examples.

### Preferred translations / glossary

### Grammar and tone

- Use clear, concise technical Traditional Chinese consistent with existing docs.
- Address the reader naturally (commonly using “你/你的”).

### Headings

- Follow existing Traditional Chinese heading style (short and descriptive).
- Do not add trailing punctuation to headings.

### Quotes and punctuation

### Quotes and punctuation

- Keep punctuation style consistent with existing Simplified Chinese docs (they often mix English terms like “FastAPI” with Chinese text).
- Never change punctuation inside inline code, code blocks, URLs, or file paths.

### Ellipsis

- Keep ellipsis style consistent within each document, prefer `...` over  `……`.
- Never change ellipsis in code, URLs, or CLI examples.

### Preferred translations / glossary

Doing this provides the following specific benefits:
- **Reduce the API surface** - We no longer need to maintain two methods.
- **Consistency** - All languages have consistent access to the same APIs and ergonomics in the DSL.
- **Reduce the size of the Gradle distribution** - We no longer need to carry multiple standard libraries for different languages.

## Decision

* **Inconsistent API surface**: Public APIs with mixed spelling conventions appear less professional and polished
* **Harder for non-native speakers**: Contributors and users for whom English is a second language benefit from a single, consistent convention

While both American and British English are valid, establishing a single standard improves consistency, readability, and maintainability of the codebase.

        assertNotSame(item1.hashCode(), item3.hashCode());

        // Consistent hashCode
        assertEquals(item1.hashCode(), item1.hashCode());
    }

    @Test
    public void test_hashCode_withNullInput() {
        // Test hashCode with null input - should not throw, returns consistent hash for null
        ProtwordsItem item1 = new ProtwordsItem(1, null);

it is unlikely that we'll be able to remove `null` entirely.

After migrating to Java 8, we can use pluggable type checkers to ensure that our annotations are consistent, 
and there are no missing null checks.

## Decision

Use "NullAway" in JSpecify mode to check for null-related errors in Java code.

### Target language

Translate to Ukrainian (українська).

Language code: uk.

### Grammar and tone

- Use polite/formal address consistent with existing Ukrainian docs (use “ви/ваш”).
- Keep the tone concise and technical.
- Use one style of dashes. For example, if text contains "-" then use only this symbol to represent a dash.

### Headings

- Follow existing Ukrainian heading style; keep headings short and instructional.

        // Each call should return a new instance
        assertNotSame(option1, option2);
    }

    @Test
    public void test_provideMappingOption_consistency() {
        // Test that multiple calls provide consistent configuration
        JsonMappingOption option1 = provider.provideMappingOption();
        JsonMappingOption option2 = provider.provideMappingOption();

        assertEquals(option1.getFieldNaming(), option2.getFieldNaming());