testCases := []struct {
		objectName string
		sipHash    int
	}{
		// cases which should pass the test.
		// passing in valid object name.
		{"object", 37},
		{"The Shining Script <v1>.pdf", 38},
		{"Cost Benefit Analysis (2009-2010).pptx", 59},
		{"117Gn8rfHL2ACARPAhaFd0AGzic9pUbIA/5OCn5A", 35},
		{"SHØRT", 49},
		{"There are far too many object names, and far too few bucket names!", 8},
		{"a/b/c/", 159},
		{"/a/b/c", 96},

///

#### Use Cases with Early Exit Code { #use-cases-with-early-exit-code }

There are some use cases with specific conditions that could benefit from the old behavior of running the exit code of dependencies with `yield` before sending the response.

You are encouraged to [write tests](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/tutorial/testing/) for your application and update your FastAPI version frequently after ensuring that your tests are passing. This way you will benefit from the latest features, bug fixes, and **security fixes**.

You can learn more about [FastAPI versions and how to pin and upgrade them](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/deployment/versions/) for your project in the docs.

   *
   * <p>The constructed {@code BloomFilter} will be serializable if the provided {@code Funnel<T>}
   * is.
   *
   * <p>It is recommended that the funnel be implemented as a Java enum. This has the benefit of
   * ensuring proper serialization and deserialization, which is important since {@link #equals}
   * also relies on object identity of funnels.
   *

   * types (or if the type is a non-variable type, like {@code String}), then code should almost
   * never use this method, preferring instead to call {@code requireNonNull} so as to benefit from
   * its runtime check.
   *
   * <p>An example use case for this method is in implementing an {@code Iterator<T>} whose {@code

   * types (or if the type is a non-variable type, like {@code String}), then code should almost
   * never use this method, preferring instead to call {@code requireNonNull} so as to benefit from
   * its runtime check.
   *
   * <p>An example use case for this method is in implementing an {@code Iterator<T>} whose {@code

   * types (or if the type is a non-variable type, like {@code String}), then code should almost
   * never use this method, preferring instead to call {@code requireNonNull} so as to benefit from
   * its runtime check.
   *
   * <p>An example use case for this method is in implementing an {@code Iterator<T>} whose {@code

   * types (or if the type is a non-variable type, like {@code String}), then code should almost
   * never use this method, preferring instead to call {@code requireNonNull} so as to benefit from
   * its runtime check.
   *
   * <p>An example use case for this method is in implementing an {@code Iterator<T>} whose {@code

* **Inconsistent API surface**: Public APIs with mixed spelling conventions appear less professional and polished
* **Harder for non-native speakers**: Contributors and users for whom English is a second language benefit from a single, consistent convention

While both American and British English are valid, establishing a single standard improves consistency, readability, and maintainability of the codebase.

## Decision

## Caveat { #caveat }

If you need to perform heavy background computation and you don't necessarily need it to be run by the same process (for example, you don't need to share memory, variables, etc), you might benefit from using other bigger tools like <a href="https://docs.celeryq.dev" class="external-link" target="_blank">Celery</a>.