CacheBuilderSpec spec = parse("");
    assertThat(spec.initialCapacity).isNull();
    assertThat(spec.maximumSize).isNull();
    assertThat(spec.maximumWeight).isNull();
    assertThat(spec.concurrencyLevel).isNull();
    assertThat(spec.keyStrength).isNull();
    assertThat(spec.valueStrength).isNull();
    assertThat(spec.writeExpirationTimeUnit).isNull();
    assertThat(spec.accessExpirationTimeUnit).isNull();

    protected void parseURL(final URL u, String spec, final int start, int limit) {
        final String host = u.getHost();
        String path, ref;
        int port;

        if (spec.equals("smb1://")) {
            spec = "smb1:////";
            limit += 2;
        } else if (!spec.startsWith("smb1://") && host != null && host.length() == 0) {
            spec = "//" + spec;
            limit += 2;
        }

    @Override
    protected void parseURL(final URL u, String spec, final int start, int limit) {
        final String host = u.getHost();
        String path, ref;
        int port;

        if (spec.equals("smb://")) {
            spec = "smb:////";
            limit += 2;
        } else if (!spec.startsWith("smb://") && host != null && host.length() == 0) {
            spec = "//" + spec;
            limit += 2;
        }

        // Based on the test output, the actual path is "/bar" when parsing relative spec "foo/bar"
        // This happens because the URL class parses "foo" as the host and "/bar" as the path
        assertEquals("/bar", actualPath, "Path should be /bar after URL parsing");
        assertEquals("foo", rel.getHost(), "Host should be 'foo' from the relative spec");
        assertNull(rel.getRef());
    }

    TestSubtype spec = method.getAnnotation(TestSubtype.class);
    assertWithMessage("%s is subtype of %s", paramType, returnType)
        .that(TypeToken.of(paramType).isSubtypeOf(returnType))
        .isTrue();
    assertWithMessage("%s is supertype of %s", returnType, paramType)
        .that(TypeToken.of(returnType).isSupertypeOf(paramType))
        .isTrue();
    if (!spec.suppressGetSubtype()) {

And the spec says that the fields have to be named like that. So `user-name` or `email` wouldn't work.

But don't worry, you can show it as you wish to your final users in the frontend.

And your database models can use any other names you want.

    grant_type: the OAuth2 spec says it is required and MUST be the fixed string "password".
        This dependency is strict about it. If you want to be permissive, use instead the
        OAuth2PasswordRequestForm dependency class.
    username: username string. The OAuth2 spec requires the exact field name "username".
    password: password string. The OAuth2 spec requires the exact field name "password".

) : OsAwareBaseGradleBuildType(
        os = performanceTestProject.spec.os,
        failStage = performanceTestProject.spec.failsStage,
        init = {
            id("${performanceTestProject.spec.asConfigurationId(model)}_Trigger")
            val performanceTestSpec = performanceTestProject.spec
            name = performanceTestProject.name + " (Trigger)"

            val os = Os.LINUX

    TestSubtype spec = method.getAnnotation(TestSubtype.class);
    assertWithMessage("%s is subtype of %s", paramType, returnType)
        .that(TypeToken.of(paramType).isSubtypeOf(returnType))
        .isTrue();
    assertWithMessage("%s is supertype of %s", returnType, paramType)
        .that(TypeToken.of(returnType).isSupertypeOf(paramType))
        .isTrue();
    if (!spec.suppressGetSubtype()) {

        public void addArtifact(ArtifactSpec spec) {
            artifacts.put(getKey(spec.artifact), spec);

            String key = spec.artifact.getDependencyConflictId();
            List<ArtifactVersion> artifactVersions = versions.computeIfAbsent(key, k -> new ArrayList<>());
            if (spec.artifact.getVersion() != null) {
                artifactVersions.add(new DefaultArtifactVersion(spec.artifact.getVersion()));
            }