3. **Flow**:
   - Review promptly to avoid blocking progress.
   - Balance quality and speed—minor issues can be addressed later via issues, not PR blocks.
   - If unable to complete the review, tag another reviewer (e.g., `@username please take over`).

4. **Shared Responsibility**:
   - All MinIO contributors are reviewers. The first commenter on a PR owns the review unless they delegate.

        This allows us to keep them consistent and up-to-date.

        If there are several native speakers commenting on this discussion and
        committing to help review new translations, the FastAPI team will review it

* Review those pull requests, requesting changes or approving them. For the languages I don't speak, I'll wait for several others to review the translation before merging.

/// tip

* Suggest a new **feature**.

**Note**: if you do it, then I'm going to ask you to also help others. 😉

## Review Pull Requests { #review-pull-requests }

You can help me review pull requests from others.

Again, please try your best to be kind. 🤗

---

Here's what to keep in mind and how to review a pull request:

### Understand the problem { #understand-the-problem }

   * the first are ignored.
   */
  public static <E> ImmutableSet<E> of(E e1, E e2) {
    return new RegularSetBuilderImpl<E>(2).add(e1).add(e2).review().build();
  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable set containing the given elements, minus duplicates, in the order each was

# consult https://www.iana.org/time-zones for the latest versions,
# update CODE and DATA below, and then run
#
#	./update.bash -commit
#
# That will prepare the files and create the commit.
#
# To review such a commit (as the reviewer), use:
#
#	git codereview change NNNNNN   # CL number
#	cd lib/time
#	./update.bash
#
# If it prints "No updates needed.", then the generated files

      env:
        TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
        CONFIG: >
          {
            "approved-1":
              {
                "number": 1,
                "await_label": "awaiting-review"
              }

I (the author, [@tiangolo](https://x.com/tiangolo)) will review it thoroughly and get back to you.

## Public Discussions

Please restrain from publicly discussing a potential security vulnerability. 🙊

    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users

   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */
  static <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] newArray(T[] reference, int length) {