* Suggest a new **feature**.

**Note**: if you do it, then I'm going to ask you to also help others. 😉

## Review Pull Requests { #review-pull-requests }

You can help me review pull requests from others.

Again, please try your best to be kind. 🤗

---

Here's what to keep in mind and how to review a pull request:

### Understand the problem { #understand-the-problem }

3. **Actively collaborate with us.** We commit real time and attention to everything we review. Low-effort submissions—where code is generated, submitted, and abandoned—waste our limited review capacity.

## What contributors can expect from us

* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made
* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like Markdown can be
* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

* Add the specific language label.
* Add the label `awaiting-review`.

The label `awaiting-review` is special, only used for translations. A GitHub Action will detect it, then it will read the language label, and it will update the GitHub Discussions managing the translations for that language to notify people that there's a new translation to review.

the pull requests by the ones with the label for your language. For example, for Spanish, the label is [`lang-es`](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3Alang-es+label%3Aawaiting-review).

You can also review already merged translation PRs. To do this, go to the [closed pull requests](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed) and filter by your language label. For example, for Spanish, you can use [`lang-es`](https://githu...

issue if there is one) requesting the feature and describing specific use cases
for it.

If we decide to pursue a feature request, it will go through a thorough process
of API design and review. Any code should come after this.

[APIs]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/API
[issue]: https://github.com/google/guava/issues

Pull requests
-------------

* **Easier onboarding**: New contributors have clear guidance on which spelling to use
* **Better searchability**: Finding code and documentation becomes more predictable
* **Reduced review friction**: Less time spent on spelling corrections during PR reviews
* **Professional appearance**: Consistent APIs and documentation appear more polished
* **Clearer contribution guidelines**: [CONTRIBUTING.md](../../CONTRIBUTING.md) now includes this requirement

      env:
        TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
        CONFIG: >
          {
            "approved-1":
              {
                "number": 1,
                "await_label": "awaiting-review"
              }

* **Embrace modern AI coding practices**: Leave everything up to an LLM to decide. The model knows best. Always.
* **No code reviews**: There's no code to review. No PRs to approve. No comments to address. Embrace vibe coding fully, replace the theater of approving and merging vibe coded PRs that no one looks at with full proper vibes only.

/// tip

            if label.name == "lang-all":
                is_lang = True
                break
        for review in pr.reviews.nodes:
            if review.author:
                authors[review.author.login] = review.author
                if is_lang:
                    translation_reviewers[review.author.login] += 1
        if pr.state == "MERGED" and pr.author:
            if is_lang: