</component>

	<!-- Jobs -->
	<component name="crawlJob" class="org.codelibs.fess.job.CrawlJob" instance="prototype">
	</component>
	<component name="suggestJob" class="org.codelibs.fess.job.SuggestJob" instance="prototype">
	</component>
	<component name="aggregateLogJob" class="org.codelibs.fess.job.AggregateLogJob" instance="prototype">
	</component>

 * in a crawler application. This container supports both singleton and prototype component
 * instantiation patterns.
 *
 * <p>The container provides mechanisms for:
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Registering and retrieving components by name</li>
 *   <li>Managing singleton instances with lifecycle hooks</li>
 *   <li>Creating prototype instances on demand</li>
 *   <li>Dependency injection using {@code @Resource} annotation</li>

        }).prototype("fsClient", FileSystemClient.class).prototype("ruleManager", RuleManagerImpl.class, manager -> {
            manager.addRule(container.getComponent("sitemapsRule"));
            manager.addRule(container.getComponent("fileRule"));
        })
                .prototype("accessResult", AccessResultImpl.class)
                .prototype("urlQueue", UrlQueueImpl.class)

        TestComponent.resetCounter();
        SingletonTestComponent.resetInstanceCount();

        // Initialize container with test components
        container = new StandardCrawlerContainer().prototype("testComponent", TestComponent.class)
                .singleton("singletonComponent", SingletonTestComponent.class)
                .singleton("factory", CrawlerPooledObjectFactory.class);

<!DOCTYPE components PUBLIC "-//DBFLUTE//DTD LastaDi 1.0//EN"
    "http://dbflute.org/meta/lastadi10.dtd">
<components namespace="fessCrawler">
    <component name="crawler" class="org.codelibs.fess.crawler.Crawler" instance="prototype"/>
    <component name="httpClient" class="org.codelibs.fess.crawler.client.http.HcHttpClient" instance="singleton"/>

                 * the map to change between that call and this one. But if that happens, the
                 * behavior is undefined because of the concurrent mutation.)
                 *
                 * (Our prototype checker happens to be "smart" enough to understand this for the
                 * *get* call in getValue but not for the *put* call here.)
                 *