*
     * Our solution is for threads to CAS seenExceptions from null to a Set populated with _the
     * initial exception_, no matter which thread does the work. This ensures that seenExceptions
     * always contains not just the current thread's exception but also the initial thread's.
     */
    Set<Throwable> seenExceptionsLocal = seenExceptions;

 * example involving two locks and two threads, deadlock occurs when one thread acquires Lock A, and
 * then Lock B, while another thread acquires Lock B, and then Lock A:
 *
 * <pre>
 * Thread1: acquire(LockA) --X acquire(LockB)
 * Thread2: acquire(LockB) --X acquire(LockA)
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>Neither thread will progress because each is waiting for the other. In more complex

    for (int i = 0; i < numThreads; i++) {
      threads[i] =
          new Thread() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
              assertSame(Boolean.TRUE, memoizedSupplier.get());
            }
          };
    }
    for (Thread t : threads) {
      t.start();
    }
    for (Thread t : threads) {
      t.join();
    }

    if (thrown.get() != null) {

    for (int i = 0; i < numThreads; i++) {
      threads[i] =
          new Thread() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
              assertSame(Boolean.TRUE, memoizedSupplier.get());
            }
          };
    }
    for (Thread t : threads) {
      t.start();
    }
    for (Thread t : threads) {
      t.join();
    }

    if (thrown.get() != null) {

   *       directExecutor}, the listener can execute in any of three possible threads:
   *       <ol>
   *         <li>When a thread attaches a listener to a {@code ListenableFuture} that's already
   *             complete, the listener runs immediately in that thread.
   *         <li>When a thread attaches a listener to a {@code ListenableFuture} that's

  /**
   * When we need a new thread to run tasks, we call [Backend.execute]. A few microseconds later we
   * expect a newly-started thread to call [Runnable.run]. We shouldn't request new threads until
   * the already-requested ones are in service, otherwise we might create more threads than we need.
   *
   * We use [executeCallCount] and [runCallCount] to defend against starting more threads than we

          public @Nullable Void call() throws Exception {
            assertEquals(Thread.currentThread().getName(), newName.get());
            return null;
          }
        };
    Callables.threadRenaming(callable, newName).call();
    assertEquals(oldName, Thread.currentThread().getName());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // threads
  public void testRenaming_exceptionalReturn() throws Exception {

          public @Nullable Void call() throws Exception {
            assertEquals(Thread.currentThread().getName(), newName.get());
            return null;
          }
        };
    Callables.threadRenaming(callable, newName).call();
    assertEquals(oldName, Thread.currentThread().getName());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // threads
  public void testRenaming_exceptionalReturn() throws Exception {

   * state: BLOCKED, WAITING, or TIMED_WAITING.
   */
  void waitForThreadToEnterWaitState(Thread thread, long timeoutMillis) {
    long startTime = System.nanoTime();
    for (; ; ) {
      Thread.State s = thread.getState();
      if (s == Thread.State.BLOCKED || s == Thread.State.WAITING || s == Thread.State.TIMED_WAITING)
        return;

   * state: BLOCKED, WAITING, or TIMED_WAITING.
   */
  void waitForThreadToEnterWaitState(Thread thread, long timeoutMillis) {
    long startTime = System.nanoTime();
    for (; ; ) {
      Thread.State s = thread.getState();
      if (s == Thread.State.BLOCKED || s == Thread.State.WAITING || s == Thread.State.TIMED_WAITING)
        return;