@J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // suite
  @AndroidIncompatible // test-suite builders
  public static Test suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();

    suite.addTest(
        SetTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestStringSetGenerator() {
                  @Override
                  protected Set<String> create(String[] elements) {
                    return union(emptySet(), emptySet());
                  }

   * separator between each, to {@code appendable}.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public <A extends Appendable> A appendTo(A appendable, Iterable<?> parts) throws IOException {
    return appendTo(appendable, parts.iterator());
  }

  /**
   * Appends the string representation of each of {@code parts}, using the previously configured

  public static Test suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();

    suite.addTest(transformSuite());
    suite.addTest(filterSuite());

    suite.addTest(
        ListMultimapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestStringListMultimapGenerator() {
                  @Override
                  protected ListMultimap<String, String> create(Entry<String, String>[] entries) {

   *       using this method. For example, {@code not(in(target))} is generally more readable than
   *       {@code not(target::contains)}.
   *   <li>This method's name conflicts with Kotlin's {@code in} operator.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p><b>Discouraged:</b> Prefer using either {@code target::contains} or {@code x ->

    // Not testing rowKeySet() or columnKeySet() of Table.transformValues()
    // since the transformation doesn't affect the row and column key sets.

    suite.addTest(
        SetTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestStringSetGenerator() {
                  @Override
                  protected Set<String> create(String[] elements) {
                    Table<String, Integer, Character> table =

   * separator between each, to {@code appendable}.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public <A extends Appendable> A appendTo(A appendable, Iterable<?> parts) throws IOException {
    return appendTo(appendable, parts.iterator());
  }

  /**
   * Appends the string representation of each of {@code parts}, using the previously configured

            .createTestSuite());

    suite.addTest(
        MultisetTestSuiteBuilder.using(unionGenerator())
            .withFeatures(CollectionSize.ANY, CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES)
            .named("Multisets.union")
            .createTestSuite());

    suite.addTest(
        MultisetTestSuiteBuilder.using(intersectionGenerator())
            .withFeatures(
                CollectionSize.ANY,

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // suite
  @AndroidIncompatible // test-suite builders
  public static Test suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();

    suite.addTest(
        SetTestSuiteBuilder.using(new ImmutableSetCopyOfGenerator())
            .named(ImmutableSetTest.class.getName())
            .withFeatures(
                CollectionSize.ANY,
                CollectionFeature.KNOWN_ORDER,

        fail("Encoding $component $codePoint using $encoding")
      }
      return
    }

    // Check that the URI and HttpURL have the exact same escaping.
    if (toAndFromUri != httpUrl) {
      fail("Encoding $component $codePoint using $encoding")
    }
    if (uri.toString() != httpUrl.toString()) {
      fail("Encoding $component $codePoint using $encoding")
    }
  }

   * SipHash-2-4 algorithm</a> using a seed value of {@code k = 00 01 02 ...}.
   *
   * @since 15.0
   */
  public static HashFunction sipHash24() {
    return SipHashFunction.SIP_HASH_24;
  }

  /**
   * Returns a hash function implementing the <a href="https://131002.net/siphash/">64-bit
   * SipHash-2-4 algorithm</a> using the given seed.
   *
   * @since 15.0
   */