Guava has mostly not used the CONTRIBUTORS file, instead relying on Git
history. You can see a summary of contributions at
https://github.com/google/guava/graphs/contributors. However, Git history
over-counts some people's contributions because they were responsible for
mirroring out changes from our internal repo.

This files serves mainly to credit people who have not received proper credit
in the Git history.

Doug Lea, author of some concurrency libraries

 *       cancelled, cancellation never propagates to a task that has started to run -- neither to
 *       the callable itself nor to any {@code Future} returned by an {@code AsyncCallable}.
 *       (However, cancellation can prevent an <i>unstarted</i> task from running.) Therefore, the
 *       next task will wait for any running callable (or pending {@code Future} returned by an

don't have to do anything. The specific rules are [already bundled][okhttp3_pro] into the JAR which can be
interpreted by R8 automatically.

If you, however, don't use R8 you have to apply the rules from [this file][okhttp3_pro]. You might
also need rules from [Okio][okio] which is a dependency of this library.

 *       cancelled, cancellation never propagates to a task that has started to run -- neither to
 *       the callable itself nor to any {@code Future} returned by an {@code AsyncCallable}.
 *       (However, cancellation can prevent an <i>unstarted</i> task from running.) Therefore, the
 *       next task will wait for any running callable (or pending {@code Future} returned by an

     * This test is indirect as the constructor would throw an exception.
     * We can't instantiate the class with null, so we can't directly test this method's behavior with null.
     * However, the constructor logic `!isCredentialTypeCorrect()` covers this.
     * If `new PacCredentialType(null)` throws, it implies `isCredentialTypeCorrect()` returned false for null.
     */
    @Test

        return this.handle.ensureOpen();
    }

    /**
     * This stream class is unbuffered. Therefore this method will always
     * return 0 for streams connected to regular files. However, a
     * stream created from a Named Pipe this method will query the server using a
     * "peek named pipe" operation and return the number of available bytes
     * on the server.
     */
    @Override

        // For 100% coverage, we'd need to ensure the superclass constructor is indeed called with these values.
        // However, given the current structure, testing the fields set by MsrpcEnumerateAliasesInDomain itself is the primary focus.
    }

 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link

   * <p>This is guaranteed to return zero if the dataset contains only exactly one finite value. It
   * is not guaranteed to return zero when the dataset consists of the same value multiple times,
   * due to numerical errors. However, it is guaranteed never to return a negative result.
   *
   * <h3>Non-finite values</h3>
   *
   * <p>If the dataset contains any non-finite values ({@link Double#POSITIVE_INFINITY}, {@link

       *
       * My impression is that an AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater in a static field is similarly fast to
       * Unsafe on modern JVMs (if perhaps not quite as fast as VarHandle?). However, I'm not sure
       * exactly what we've benchmarked, and we certainly haven't benchmarked as far back as JDK 8.
       * (We also haven't benchmarked under Android. We continue to use UnsafeAtomicHelper there so