assertEquals(SmbComTransaction.TRANSACTION_BUF_SIZE, buffer2.length, "Reused buffer should have correct size");

        // Note: We don't check if content is cleared as that's not a security requirement
        // The important part is that the buffer is valid and has correct size
    }

    /**
     * Test getBuffers method for transaction buffers.
     */
    @Test

			pools:          pools,
			name:           "Correct",
			expectedErr:    false,
			expectedUpdate: false,
		},
		{
			meta:           meta,
			pools:          newPools,
			name:           "Correct-Update",
			expectedErr:    false,
			expectedUpdate: true,
		},
		{
			meta:           meta,
			pools:          reducedPools,
			name:           "Correct-Update",
			expectedErr:    false,

The correct place is:

* In the key `content`, that has as value another JSON object (`dict`) that contains:
    * A key with the media type, e.g. `application/json`, that contains as value another JSON object, that contains:
        * A key `schema`, that has as the value the JSON Schema from the model, here's the correct place.

        assertEquals(32, derived1.length, "Derived key should have correct length");
        assertEquals(32, derived2.length, "Derived key should have correct length");
        assertEquals(32, derived3.length, "Derived key should have correct length");

        assertFalse(Arrays.equals(derived1, derived2), "Different labels should produce different keys");

Of course, the attackers would not try all this by hand, they would write a program to do it, possibly with thousands or millions of tests per second. And they would get just one extra correct letter at a time.

But doing that, in some minutes or hours the attackers would have guessed the correct username and password, with the "help" of our application, just using the time taken to answer.

#### Fix it with `secrets.compare_digest()` { #fix-it-with-secrets-compare-digest }

			t.Logf("But expected read quorum error, not object-not-found error")
		}
	})

	t.Run("if-match with correct ETag and read quorum failure", func(t *testing.T) {
		// Test Case 3: if-match with CORRECT ETag but read quorum failure
		// Even with the correct ETag, we shouldn't proceed if we can't verify it.
		opts := ObjectOptions{
			UserDefined: map[string]string{
				xhttp.IfMatch: existingETag,

    assertEquals("correct", f.apply(new Object()));
    assertEquals("correct", f.apply(null));

    Function<@Nullable Object, @Nullable String> g = Functions.constant(null);
    assertEquals(null, g.apply(2));
    assertEquals(null, g.apply(null));

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(f, Functions.constant("correct"))

        json_schema_extra={
            "description": (
                "response_model_by_alias=False is basically a quick hack, to support "
                "proper OpenAPI use another model with the correct field names"
            )
        }
    )


@app.get("/dict", response_model=Model, response_model_by_alias=False)
def read_dict():
    return {"alias": "Foo"}

		t.Errorf("Count() method should get correct value, expect: %v, got %v", count, len(users))
	}

	if err := DB.Model(&User{}).Where("name = ?", user1.Name).Or("name = ?", user3.Name).Count(&count).Find(&users).Error; err != nil {
		t.Errorf("Count should work, but got err %v", err)
	}

	if count != int64(len(users)) {
		t.Errorf("Count() method should get correct value, expect: %v, got %v", count, len(users))
	}

			return err
		}
		return nil
	})
	if err != nil {
		t.Errorf("WithSingleConnection should work, but got err %v", err)
	}

	if actualName != expectedName {
		t.Errorf("WithSingleConnection() method should get correct value, expect: %v, got %v", expectedName, actualName)
	}
}

func getSetSQL(driverName string) (string, string) {
	switch driverName {
	case mysql.Dialector{}.Name():
		return "SET @testName := ?", "SELECT @testName"