If your CL addresses an accepted proposal, mention the proposal issue number in
your release note in the form `/issue/NUMBER`. A link to the issue in the text
will have this form (see below). If you don't want to mention the issue in the
text, add it as a comment:
```
<!-- go.dev/issue/12345 -->
```
If an accepted proposal is mentioned in a CL but not in the release notes, it will be

#
# That will prepare the files and create the commit.
#
# To review such a commit (as the reviewer), use:
#
#	git codereview change NNNNNN   # CL number
#	cd lib/time
#	./update.bash
#
# If it prints "No updates needed.", then the generated files
# in the CL match the update.bash in the CL.

# Versions to use.
CODE=2024b
DATA=2024b

set -e

cd $(dirname $0)
rm -rf work
mkdir work

build:avx_win --copt=/arch:AVX

# Use Clang-cl compiler on Windows
build:win_clang --copt=/clang:-Weverything
build:win_clang --extra_toolchains=@local_config_cc//:cc-toolchain-x64_windows-clang-cl
build:win_clang --extra_execution_platforms=//tensorflow/tools/toolchains/win:x64_windows-clang-cl
build:win_clang --host_platform=//tensorflow/tools/toolchains/win:x64_windows-clang-cl
build:win_clang --compiler=clang-cl
build:win_clang --linkopt=/FORCE:MULTIPLE

# MSVC compilers installed, and a particular one should be used.
# To find exact versions available:
# - Navigate to the relevant folder, e.g.
#     C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022
# - Search for the `cl.exe` file: `gci -r -fi cl.exe`
# - The version will be part of the found path, e.g.
#     2022\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.39.33519\bin\Hostx64\x64
# ENV BAZEL_VC_FULL_VERSION 14.39.33519

# Install Bazelisk.
RUN md C:\tools\bazel

	})
	return routes, nil
}

func isPassthrough(action any) bool {
	a, ok := action.(*route.Route_Route)
	if !ok {
		return false
	}
	cl, ok := a.Route.ClusterSpecifier.(*route.RouteAction_Cluster)
	if !ok {
		return false
	}
	return cl.Cluster == pilot_util.PassthroughCluster

            realm.importFrom(parentRealm, "");
        } else if (STRATEGY_PLUGIN.equals(classLoadingStrategy)) {
            coreExports.getExportedPackages().forEach((p, cl) -> realm.importFrom(cl, p));
            providedArtifacts = coreExports.getExportedArtifacts();
        } else if (STRATEGY_SELF_FIRST.equals(classLoadingStrategy)) {
            realm.setParentRealm(parentRealm);
        } else {

		defer lockServers[i].setRefreshReply(true)
	}

	dm := NewDRWMutex(ds, "aap")
	dm.refreshInterval = 500 * time.Millisecond
	var wg sync.WaitGroup
	wg.Add(1)

	ctx, cl := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
	cancel := func() {
		cl()
		wg.Done()
	}

	if !dm.GetLock(ctx, cancel, id, source, Options{Timeout: 5 * time.Minute}) {
		t.Fatal("GetLock() should be successful")
	}

	}
}

// newMuxClient returns a mux client for manual use.
func (c *Subroute) newMuxClient(ctx context.Context) (*muxClient, error) {
	cl, err := c.Connection.newMuxClient(ctx)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	cl.subroute = &c.subID
	return cl, nil
}

// Request allows to do a single remote request.
// 'req' will not be used after the call and caller can reuse.

        if (cl.hasOption(CLIManager.ALSO_MAKE) && !cl.hasOption(CLIManager.ALSO_MAKE_DEPENDENTS)) {
            return MavenExecutionRequest.REACTOR_MAKE_UPSTREAM;
        } else if (!cl.hasOption(CLIManager.ALSO_MAKE) && cl.hasOption(CLIManager.ALSO_MAKE_DEPENDENTS)) {
            return MavenExecutionRequest.REACTOR_MAKE_DOWNSTREAM;

     */
    if (throwable instanceof Error) {
      /*
       * TODO(cpovirk): Do we really want to log this if we called setException(throwable) and it
       * returned true? This was intentional (CL 46470009), but it seems odd compared to how we
       * normally handle Error.
       *
       * Similarly, do we really want to log the same Error more than once?
       */
      log(throwable);
    }
  }