execution it sees that the classpath has changed, and so to be
       safe, it needs to re-run.

       - This is unfortunate, because actually it would be safe to declare
       the task as up-to-date, because these two files, which are based on
       the generated index.xml, are outputs, not inputs. We can be sure of
       this because they are deleted in the @BeforeEach method of the

            "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.",
            "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.",
            "The process cannot access the file because another process has locked a portion of the file.", "The disk is full.",

            "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.",
            "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.",
            "The process cannot access the file because another process has locked a portion of the file.", "The disk is full.",

    int NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND = 0xC000003a;
    /** The object path syntax is bad */
    int NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_SYNTAX_BAD = 0xC000003b;
    /** The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process */
    int NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION = 0xC0000043;
    /** The file is pending deletion */
    int NT_STATUS_DELETE_PENDING = 0xC0000056;

     *   <li>If this field's value == currentThread, we know that it's up to date, because write
     *       operations in a thread always happen-before subsequent read operations in the same
     *       thread
     *   <li>If this field's value == null because of unsafe publication, we know that it isn't the
     *       object associated with our thread, because if it was the publication wouldn't have been

 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link
 * IteratorTester#newTargetIterator()} method. This is because it's impossible to test an Iterator
 * without changing its state, so the tester needs a steady supply of fresh Iterators.
 *
 * <p>If your iterator supports modification through {@code remove()}, you may wish to override the

     *   <li>If this field's value == currentThread, we know that it's up to date, because write
     *       operations in a thread always happen-before subsequent read operations in the same
     *       thread
     *   <li>If this field's value == null because of unsafe publication, we know that it isn't the
     *       object associated with our thread, because if it was the publication wouldn't have been

         * one, meaning this message cannot be batched.
         */
        return 0;
    }

    /*
     * We overload this method from ServerMessageBlock because
     * we want writeAndXWireFormat to write the parameterWords
     * and bytes. This is so we can write batched smbs because
     * all but the first smb of the chaain do not have a header
     * and therefore we do not want to writeHeaderWireFormat. We

            "The SAM database on the Windows NT Server does not have a computer account for this workstation trust relationship.",
            "The logon request failed because the trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed.",
            "The logon request failed because the trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed.",

Guava has mostly not used the CONTRIBUTORS file, instead relying on Git
history. You can see a summary of contributions at
https://github.com/google/guava/graphs/contributors. However, Git history
over-counts some people's contributions because they were responsible for
mirroring out changes from our internal repo.

This files serves mainly to credit people who have not received proper credit
in the Git history.

Doug Lea, author of some concurrency libraries