return Types.toString(type);
    }

    boolean jdkTypeDuplicatesOwnerName() {
      return true;
    }
  }

  /**
   * Per <a href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1635">issue 1635</a>, In JDK 1.7.0_51-b13,
   * {@link TypeVariableImpl#equals(Object)} is changed to no longer be equal to custom TypeVariable
   * implementations. As a result, we need to make sure our TypeVariable implementation respects

map[Point]string{{0, 0}: "orig"}    // same as map[Point]string{Point{0, 0}: "orig"}

type PPoint *Point
[2]*Point{{1.5, -3.5}, {}}          // same as [2]*Point{&Point{1.5, -3.5}, &Point{}}
[2]PPoint{{1.5, -3.5}, {}}          // same as [2]PPoint{PPoint(&Point{1.5, -3.5}), PPoint(&Point{})}
</pre>

<p>
A parsing ambiguity arises when a composite literal using the

    ticker.advance(8998);
    assertEquals("9.999 \u03bcs", stopwatch.toString());
    stopwatch.reset();
    stopwatch.start();
    ticker.advance(1234567);
    assertEquals("1.235 ms", stopwatch.toString());
    stopwatch.reset();
    stopwatch.start();
    ticker.advance(5000000000L);
    assertEquals("5.000 s", stopwatch.toString());
    stopwatch.reset();
    stopwatch.start();

    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2}, 1, new byte[] {2, 1});
    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2}, 2, new byte[] {1, 2});
    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2}, 3, new byte[] {2, 1});

    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2, 3}, -5, new byte[] {3, 1, 2});
    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2, 3}, -4, new byte[] {2, 3, 1});
    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2, 3}, -3, new byte[] {1, 2, 3});
    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2, 3}, -2, new byte[] {3, 1, 2});

    ticker.advance(8998);
    assertEquals("9.999 \u03bcs", stopwatch.toString());
    stopwatch.reset();
    stopwatch.start();
    ticker.advance(1234567);
    assertEquals("1.235 ms", stopwatch.toString());
    stopwatch.reset();
    stopwatch.start();
    ticker.advance(5000000000L);
    assertEquals("5.000 s", stopwatch.toString());
    stopwatch.reset();
    stopwatch.start();

    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2}, 1, new byte[] {2, 1});
    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2}, 2, new byte[] {1, 2});
    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2}, 3, new byte[] {2, 1});

    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2, 3}, -5, new byte[] {3, 1, 2});
    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2, 3}, -4, new byte[] {2, 3, 1});
    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2, 3}, -3, new byte[] {1, 2, 3});
    testRotate(new byte[] {1, 2, 3}, -2, new byte[] {3, 1, 2});

map[Point]string{{0, 0}: "orig"}    // same as map[Point]string{Point{0, 0}: "orig"}

type PPoint *Point
[2]*Point{{1.5, -3.5}, {}}          // same as [2]*Point{&Point{1.5, -3.5}, &Point{}}
[2]PPoint{{1.5, -3.5}, {}}          // same as [2]PPoint{PPoint(&Point{1.5, -3.5}), PPoint(&Point{})}
</pre>

<p>
A parsing ambiguity arises when a composite literal using the

    testRotate(new char[] {'1', '2'}, 2, new char[] {'1', '2'});
    testRotate(new char[] {'1', '2'}, 3, new char[] {'2', '1'});

    testRotate(new char[] {'1', '2', '3'}, -5, new char[] {'3', '1', '2'});
    testRotate(new char[] {'1', '2', '3'}, -4, new char[] {'2', '3', '1'});
    testRotate(new char[] {'1', '2', '3'}, -3, new char[] {'1', '2', '3'});

    assertThat(fluent(1, 3, 5).copyInto(Lists.newArrayList(1, 2)))
        .containsExactly(1, 2, 1, 3, 5)
        .inOrder();
  }

  public void testCopyInto_set() {
    assertThat(fluent(1, 3, 5).copyInto(newHashSet(1, 2))).containsExactly(1, 2, 3, 5);
  }

  public void testCopyInto_setAllDuplicates() {
    assertThat(fluent(1, 3, 5).copyInto(newHashSet(1, 2, 3, 5))).containsExactly(1, 2, 3, 5);
  }

    testRotate(new double[] {1, 2}, 1, new double[] {2, 1});
    testRotate(new double[] {1, 2}, 2, new double[] {1, 2});
    testRotate(new double[] {1, 2}, 3, new double[] {2, 1});

    testRotate(new double[] {1, 2, 3}, -5, new double[] {3, 1, 2});
    testRotate(new double[] {1, 2, 3}, -4, new double[] {2, 3, 1});
    testRotate(new double[] {1, 2, 3}, -3, new double[] {1, 2, 3});