This way, its schema will show up in the API docs user interface:

<img src="/img/tutorial/dataclasses/image01.png">

## Dataclasses in Nested Data Structures

You can also combine `dataclasses` with other type annotations to make nested data structures.

In some cases, you might still have to use Pydantic's version of `dataclasses`. For example, if you have errors with the automatically generated API documentation.

    String SELF_COMBINATION_MERGE = "merge";

    String SELF_COMBINATION_REMOVE = "remove";

    /**
     * In case of complex XML structures, combining can be done based on id.
     */
    String ID_COMBINATION_MODE_ATTRIBUTE = "combine.id";

    /**
     * In case of complex XML structures, combining can be done based on keys.
     * This is a comma separated list of attribute names.
     */

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;

/**
 * This is the main graph data structure used by the RepositorySystem to present tree and graph objects.
 *
 *
 */
@Deprecated
public class MetadataGraph {
    /** all graph nodes */
    Collection<MetadataGraphNode> nodes;

    /** entry point for tree-like structures */
    MetadataGraphNode entry;

    public MetadataGraph(MetadataGraphNode entry) {

 * underlying (implementation specific) data structures to be shared.
 *
 * <p>The size of the data structure used by ArrayBasedCharEscaper and ArrayBasedUnicodeEscaper is
 * proportional to the highest valued character that has a replacement. For example a replacement
 * map containing the single character '{@literal \}u1000' will require approximately 16K of memory.

All `go/types` data structures that expose sequences using a pair of
methods such as `Len() int` and `At(int) T` now also methods that
return iterators, allowing you to simplify code such as this:

```go
params := fn.Type.(*types.Signature).Params()
for i := 0; i < params.Len(); i++ {
   use(params.At(i))
}
```

to this:

```go
for param := range fn.Signature().Params().Variables() {
   use(param)
}
```

- **Flexibility and Control:**
Java serialization offers limited control over the serialization process, such as excluding certain fields, customizing naming conventions, and handling complex data structures more gracefully.

- **Security:**
Java serialization poses security risks, especially related to deserialization vulnerabilities.

- **Version Compatibility:**

well defined data structure. To understand `xl.meta` here are the few things to start with

`xl.meta` carries first 8 bytes an XL header which describes the current format and the format version,
allowing the unmarshaller's to automatically use the right data structures to parse the subsequent content in the stream.

### v1.0

| Entry     | Encoding    | Content

    Arrays.fill(result, oldSize, newSize, ABSENT);
    return result;
  }

  @Override
  public int size() {
    return size;
  }

  /**
   * Ensures that all of the internal structures in the HashBiMap are ready for this many elements.
   */
  private void ensureCapacity(int minCapacity) {
    if (nextInBucketKToV.length < minCapacity) {
      int oldCapacity = nextInBucketKToV.length;

    * Parce que les structures de données de pydantic consistent seulement en une instance de classe que vous définissez; l'auto-complétion, le linting, mypy et votre intuition devrait être largement suffisante pour valider vos données.
* Valide les **structures complexes**:
    * Utilise les modèles hiérarchique de Pydantic, le `typage` Python pour les `Lists`, `Dict`, etc.

    * Because pydantic data structures are just instances of classes you define; auto-completion, linting, mypy and your intuition should all work properly with your validated data.
* Validate **complex structures**:
    * Use of hierarchical Pydantic models, Python `typing`’s `List` and `Dict`, etc.