*
     * <p>It is strongly encouraged to use {@link #add(String, Object)} instead and give value a
     * readable name.
     */
    @CanIgnoreReturnValue
    public ToStringHelper addValue(@Nullable Object value) {
      return addHolder(value);
    }

    /**
     * Adds an unnamed value to the formatted output.
     *

     *
     * <p>It is strongly encouraged to use {@link #add(String, Object)} instead and give value a
     * readable name.
     */
    @CanIgnoreReturnValue
    public ToStringHelper addValue(@Nullable Object value) {
      return addHolder(value);
    }

    /**
     * Adds an unnamed value to the formatted output.
     *

          required: true
        - label: >
            I have read and understood
            [Guava's philosophy](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/PhilosophyExplained), and
            I strongly believe that this proposal aligns with it.

   * the backport does. For now, we're keeping the class declaration in *both* flavors so that both
   * flavors can read old data or data from the other flavor. However, we strongly discourage
   * relying on this, as we have made incompatible changes to serialized forms in the past and
   * expect to do so again, as discussed in https://github.com/google/guava#important-warnings.
   */

 * i.e. {@code if (key1.equals(key2))} then {@code striped.get(key1) == striped.get(key2)} (assuming
 * {@link Object#hashCode()} is correctly implemented for the keys). Note that if {@code key1} is
 * <strong>not</strong> equal to {@code key2}, it is <strong>not</strong> guaranteed that {@code
 * striped.get(key1) != striped.get(key2)}; the elements might nevertheless be mapped to the same

> NOTE:  While MinIO does not implement an upper boundary on buckets, your cluster's hardware has natural limits that depend on the workload and its scaling patterns. We strongly recommend [MinIO SUBNET](https://min.io/pricing) for architecture and sizing guidance for your production use case.

## List of Amazon S3 APIs not supported on MinIO

removed, at any time. If your code is a library itself (i.e. it is
used on the CLASSPATH of users outside your own control), you should
not use beta APIs, unless you [repackage] them. **If your
code is a library, we strongly recommend using the [Guava Beta Checker] to
ensure that you do not use any `@Beta` APIs!**

[Guava Beta Checker]: https://github.com/google/guava-beta-checker

<!-- References -->

  - type: dropdown
    id: tf-nightly
    attributes:
      label: Have you reproduced the bug with TensorFlow Nightly?
      description: It is strongly suggested that you reproduce the bug with [TensorFlow Nightly](https://www.tensorflow.org/install/pip#nightly)
      options:
        - "Yes"
        - "No"
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: markdown

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Utilities necessary for working with libraries that supply plain {@link Future} instances. Note
 * that, whenever possible, it is strongly preferred to modify those libraries to return {@code
 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * <p>For interoperability between {@code ListenableFuture} and <b>{@code CompletableFuture}</b>,

    time. If your code is a library itself (i.e., it is used on the CLASSPATH of
    users outside your own control), you should not use beta APIs unless you
    [repackage] them. **If your code is a library, we strongly recommend using
    the [Guava Beta Checker] to ensure that you do not use any `@Beta` APIs!**

2.  APIs without `@Beta` will remain binary-compatible for the indefinite