},
		// Keys and input order of k=v is same.
		{
			input: `connection_string="host=localhost port=2832" comment="really long comment"`,
			keys:  []string{"connection_string", "comment"},
			expectedFields: map[string]struct{}{
				`connection_string="host=localhost port=2832"`: {},
				`comment="really long comment"`:                {},
			},
		},
		// Keys with spaces in between
		{

                        "type": "other.Type",
                        "member": "Method other.Type.someMethod",
                        "changes": ["Method has been removed"],
                        "acceptation": "I really want to do this"
                    }
                ]
            }
        """])

        then:
        changes.acceptedChanges.size() == 2
    }

                PACKAGE.getPhase(),
                "BEER",
                INSTALL.getPhase());

        // The two phases below are really for future expansion, some would say they lack a drink
        // The point being that they do not really have to match the "real" stuff,
        List<String> stubCleanCycle = Arrays.asList(PRE_CLEAN.getPhase(), CLEAN.getPhase(), POST_CLEAN.getPhase());

        List<String> stubSiteCycle =

        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the

def fake_save_user(user_in: UserIn):
    hashed_password = fake_password_hasher(user_in.password)
    user_in_db = UserInDB(**user_in.model_dump(), hashed_password=hashed_password)
    print("User saved! ..not really")
    return user_in_db


@app.post("/user/", response_model=UserOut)
async def create_user(user_in: UserIn):
    user_saved = fake_save_user(user_in)

def fake_save_user(user_in: UserIn):
    hashed_password = fake_password_hasher(user_in.password)
    user_in_db = UserInDB(**user_in.model_dump(), hashed_password=hashed_password)
    print("User saved! ..not really")
    return user_in_db


@app.post("/user/", response_model=UserOut)
async def create_user(user_in: UserIn):
    user_saved = fake_save_user(user_in)

@Deprecated
public class ArtifactResolutionRequest implements RepositoryRequest {
    private static final String LS = System.lineSeparator();

    private Artifact artifact;

    // Needs to go away
    // These are really overrides now, projects defining dependencies for a plugin that override what is
    // specified in the plugin itself.
    private Set<Artifact> artifactDependencies;

    private ArtifactRepository localRepository;

        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this feature in a real-world scenario, or is it
        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case
        that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the real-world use case so the

def fake_save_user(user_in: UserIn):
    hashed_password = fake_password_hasher(user_in.password)
    user_in_db = UserInDB(**user_in.model_dump(), hashed_password=hashed_password)
    print("User saved! ..not really")
    return user_in_db


@app.post("/user/", response_model=UserOut)
async def create_user(user_in: UserIn):
    user_saved = fake_save_user(user_in)

def fake_save_user(user_in: UserIn):
    hashed_password = fake_password_hasher(user_in.password)
    user_in_db = UserInDB(**user_in.model_dump(), hashed_password=hashed_password)
    print("User saved! ..not really")
    return user_in_db


@app.post("/user/", response_model=UserOut)
async def create_user(user_in: UserIn):
    user_saved = fake_save_user(user_in)