## Motivation and Context


## How to test this PR?


## Types of changes
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Optimization (provides speedup with no functional changes)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

## Checklist:
- [ ] Fixes a regression (If yes, please add `commit-id` or `PR #` here)

        checkVersionsOrder(b, c); // now b < c, but before MNG-5568, we had b > c
        checkVersionsOrder(a, c);
    }

    /**
     * Test <a href="https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6572">MNG-6572</a> optimization.
     */
    @Test
    void testMng6572() {
        String a = "20190126.230843"; // resembles a SNAPSHOT
        String b = "1234567890.12345"; // 10 digit number

// Test to ensure that a registered graph optimization pass is only executed
// once (i.e., on the main function side) in running distributed functions.
// This test creates a cluster with two workers, create a variable on the
// second worker, and run a distributed function (VariableAddFunction) whose ops
// span the local and remote workers. If the graph optimization pass is executed

# Note: We intentionally don't add the flags we'd need to make Flags and Enums
# work. That's because the Proguard configuration required to make them work on
# optimized code would preclude lots of optimization, like converting enums
# into ints.

# Throwables uses internal APIs for lazy stack trace resolution
-dontnote sun.misc.SharedSecrets
-keep class sun.misc.SharedSecrets {
  *** getJavaLangAccess(...);
}
-dontnote sun.misc.JavaLangAccess

       * doesn't need access to the futures again, so we can just pass `null`.
       *
       * TODO(b/112550045): Allocating a single, cheaper listener is (I think) only an optimization.
       * If we make some other optimizations, this one will no longer be necessary. The optimization
       * could actually hurt in some cases, as it forces us to keep all inputs in memory until the
       * final input completes.
       */
      @RetainedLocalRef

#### Optimizations

A naive implementation would simply regenerate all resources, of all subscribed types, for each client, on any configuration change. However, this scales poorly. As a result, we have many levels of optimizations to avoid doing this work.

 *
 *
 */
@Deprecated
public class MetadataTreeNode {
    ArtifactMetadata md; // this node

    MetadataTreeNode parent; // papa

    /** default # of children. Used for tree creation optimization only */
    int nChildren = 8;

    MetadataTreeNode[] children; // of cause

    public int getNChildren() {
        return nChildren;
    }

    public void setNChildren(int children) {

         * All you need is a good internet connection and you are all set.
      * Try to build TF from sources by changing CPU optimization flags.
   
   *Please let us know if this helps.*
   
windows_comment: >
   From the stack trace it looks like you are hitting windows path length limit.
      * Try to disable path length limit on Windows 10.

	_, err := objAPI.DeleteObject(ctx, minioMetaBucket, configFile, ObjectOptions{
		DeletePrefix:       true,
		DeletePrefixObject: true, // use prefix delete on exact object (this is an optimization to avoid fan-out calls)
	})
	if err != nil && isErrObjectNotFound(err) {
		return errConfigNotFound
	}
	return err
}

        entry != null;
        entry = entry.getNextInKeyBucket()) {
      Object candidateKey = entry.getKey();

      /*
       * Assume that equals uses the == optimization when appropriate, and that
       * it would check hash codes as an optimization when appropriate. If we
       * did these things, it would just make things worse for the most
       * performance-conscious users.
       */